Welcome to the FlexRadio Community! Please review the new Community Rules and other important new Community information on the Message Board.
Need the latest SmartSDR or 4O3A Genius Product Software?
SmartSDR v4.1.3 | SmartSDR v4.1.3 Release Notes
SmartSDR v3.10.15 | SmartSDR v3.10.15 Release Notes
The latest 4O3A Genius Product Software and Firmware
SmartSDR v4.1.3 | SmartSDR v4.1.3 Release Notes
SmartSDR v3.10.15 | SmartSDR v3.10.15 Release Notes
The latest 4O3A Genius Product Software and Firmware
If you are having a problem, please refer to the product documentation or check the Help Center for known solutions.
Need technical support from FlexRadio? It's as simple as Creating a HelpDesk ticket.
Need technical support from FlexRadio? It's as simple as Creating a HelpDesk ticket.
Allow more than one slice to send to the same DAX stream
David Salomon
Member ✭✭
I run multiple, simultaneous digital decoding on my 6600M. I set different slices to different frequencies. I use VAC to combine the streams into one, all of which are fed to a single instance of the decoding software. I have to do it this way because SSDR and/or DAX will not allow more than one slice to be set to the same DAX stream.
It would be nice if that limitation was removed, allowing multiple audio streams to go to the same DAX stream. This would remove the need for VAC and the associated audio lag (albeit very, very small).
It would be nice if that limitation was removed, allowing multiple audio streams to go to the same DAX stream. This would remove the need for VAC and the associated audio lag (albeit very, very small).
0
Comments
-
My first thought is the possible interference and resulting signal degradation that the audio from one slice might have on the others. Like putting 4 slices on different frequencies of a pile-up and listening to all of them at the same time.
0 -
Is running multiple instances of the decoding software not possible or just not desirable?
Which software is that?0 -
Sounds like what you want is for flex to incorporate VAC software into their SSDR software - since VAC already exists, what would be the benefit of such an exercise? (Not trying to be snarky, but it seems a non-trivial effort that would only recreate something that already exists.)0
-
Tim - you'd be surprised. Like I said, I do this with VAC and it works fine.
Danny - running multiple instances is not desirable, but is certainly possible.
Ken - I think DAX already is virtual audio cable-like functionality. I was just suggesting that it be taken one step further, simply to reduce the third party tools required to accomplish what I want. Less interconnected stuff = less possible problems. You comment did not come across as snarky.
73 - David0
Leave a Comment
Categories
- All Categories
- 377 Community Topics
- 2.1K New Ideas
- 630 The Flea Market
- 8.2K Software
- 107 SmartSDR+
- 6.4K SmartSDR for Windows
- 183 SmartSDR for Maestro and M models
- 427 SmartSDR for Mac
- 271 SmartSDR for iOS
- 255 SmartSDR CAT
- 190 DAX
- 382 SmartSDR API
- 9.3K Radios and Accessories
- 36 Aurora
- 251 FLEX-8000 Signature Series
- 7.2K FLEX-6000 Signature Series
- 942 Maestro
- 55 FlexControl
- 865 FLEX Series (Legacy) Radios
- 919 Genius Products
- 461 Power Genius XL Amplifier
- 335 Tuner Genius XL
- 123 Antenna Genius
- 296 Shack Infrastructure
- 208 Networking
- 454 Remote Operation (SmartLink)
- 144 Contesting
- 784 Peripherals & Station Integration
- 139 Amateur Radio Interests
- 1K Third-Party Software

