Welcome to the FlexRadio Community! Please review the new Community Rules and other important new Community information on the Message Board.
Need the latest SmartSDR or 4O3A Genius Product Software?
SmartSDR v4.1.5 | SmartSDR v4.1.5 Release Notes
SmartSDR v3.10.15 | SmartSDR v3.10.15 Release Notes
The latest 4O3A Genius Product Software and Firmware
SmartSDR v4.1.5 | SmartSDR v4.1.5 Release Notes
SmartSDR v3.10.15 | SmartSDR v3.10.15 Release Notes
The latest 4O3A Genius Product Software and Firmware
If you are having a problem, please refer to the product documentation or check the Help Center for known solutions.
Need technical support from FlexRadio? It's as simple as Creating a HelpDesk ticket.
Need technical support from FlexRadio? It's as simple as Creating a HelpDesk ticket.
Allow more than one slice to send to the same DAX stream
David Salomon
Member ✭✭
I run multiple, simultaneous digital decoding on my 6600M. I set different slices to different frequencies. I use VAC to combine the streams into one, all of which are fed to a single instance of the decoding software. I have to do it this way because SSDR and/or DAX will not allow more than one slice to be set to the same DAX stream.
It would be nice if that limitation was removed, allowing multiple audio streams to go to the same DAX stream. This would remove the need for VAC and the associated audio lag (albeit very, very small).
It would be nice if that limitation was removed, allowing multiple audio streams to go to the same DAX stream. This would remove the need for VAC and the associated audio lag (albeit very, very small).
0
Comments
-
My first thought is the possible interference and resulting signal degradation that the audio from one slice might have on the others. Like putting 4 slices on different frequencies of a pile-up and listening to all of them at the same time.
0 -
Is running multiple instances of the decoding software not possible or just not desirable?
Which software is that?0 -
Sounds like what you want is for flex to incorporate VAC software into their SSDR software - since VAC already exists, what would be the benefit of such an exercise? (Not trying to be snarky, but it seems a non-trivial effort that would only recreate something that already exists.)0
-
Tim - you'd be surprised. Like I said, I do this with VAC and it works fine.
Danny - running multiple instances is not desirable, but is certainly possible.
Ken - I think DAX already is virtual audio cable-like functionality. I was just suggesting that it be taken one step further, simply to reduce the third party tools required to accomplish what I want. Less interconnected stuff = less possible problems. You comment did not come across as snarky.
73 - David0
Leave a Comment
Categories
- All Categories
- 383 Community Topics
- 2.1K New Ideas
- 640 The Flea Market
- 8.3K Software
- 147 SmartSDR+
- 6.4K SmartSDR for Windows
- 188 SmartSDR for Maestro and M models
- 435 SmartSDR for Mac
- 274 SmartSDR for iOS
- 262 SmartSDR CAT
- 201 DAX
- 383 SmartSDR API
- 9.4K Radios and Accessories
- 47 Aurora
- 279 FLEX-8000 Signature Series
- 7.2K FLEX-6000 Signature Series
- 958 Maestro
- 58 FlexControl
- 866 FLEX Series (Legacy) Radios
- 934 Genius Products
- 466 Power Genius XL Amplifier
- 342 Tuner Genius XL
- 126 Antenna Genius
- 305 Shack Infrastructure
- 214 Networking
- 464 Remote Operation (SmartLink)
- 144 Contesting
- 796 Peripherals & Station Integration
- 142 Amateur Radio Interests
- 1K Third-Party Software

