Welcome to the FlexRadio Community! Please review the new Community Rules and other important new Community information on the Message Board.
Need the latest SmartSDR or 4O3A Genius Product Software?
SmartSDR v3.10.15 and the SmartSDR v3.10.15 Release Notes
The latest 4O3A Genius Product Software and Firmware
SmartSDR v3.10.15 and the SmartSDR v3.10.15 Release Notes
The latest 4O3A Genius Product Software and Firmware
If you are having a problem, please refer to the product documentation or check the Help Center for known solutions.
Need technical support from FlexRadio? It's as simple as Creating a HelpDesk ticket.
Need technical support from FlexRadio? It's as simple as Creating a HelpDesk ticket.
Remote Operation using Starlink - Performance Report
widowsson_N6ATC
Member ✭✭
If anyone is interested in latency using Starlink (remote connection via SoftEther to my 6600/PGXL/TGXL) from a gigabit Cox cable connection, here you go.
It works. It's not flawless, but it works.
My shack is in my other house 110 miles north of me as the crow flies. If I had a wired Internet connection (as opposed to LEO satellites), it would be rock solid. As it is, using Starlink, it is "mostly ok". I rate it 65% perfect for rag-chewing. Definitely not acceptable for contesting. Expect some dropouts. But I have had signal reports of "excellent, perfect audio". I probably should have recorded them!
EDIT: my grade may have been a bit harsh. There are times it is 75% perfect, which I think is good considering the use of Starlink. This proves that perfectly acceptable operation is possible. Plus, in my location, I have obstructions to an open-sky view. Starlink will tell you that obstructions are deadly, and you'll get lots of interruptions. We rarely get them streaming video TV services. But, for ham radio use, it's much more of a factor. The next comment shows my obstruction picture.
It works. It's not flawless, but it works.
My shack is in my other house 110 miles north of me as the crow flies. If I had a wired Internet connection (as opposed to LEO satellites), it would be rock solid. As it is, using Starlink, it is "mostly ok". I rate it 65% perfect for rag-chewing. Definitely not acceptable for contesting. Expect some dropouts. But I have had signal reports of "excellent, perfect audio". I probably should have recorded them!
EDIT: my grade may have been a bit harsh. There are times it is 75% perfect, which I think is good considering the use of Starlink. This proves that perfectly acceptable operation is possible. Plus, in my location, I have obstructions to an open-sky view. Starlink will tell you that obstructions are deadly, and you'll get lots of interruptions. We rarely get them streaming video TV services. But, for ham radio use, it's much more of a factor. The next comment shows my obstruction picture.
1
Comments
-
My obstructions. Red is bad. Blue is good. The red is from 60-foot Ponderosa pine trees.0
-
And... here is an image showing latency from my router to the Internet over a 24-hour period using Starlink, on the network where the Flex equipment is located.0
Leave a Comment
Categories
- All Categories
- 353 Community Topics
- 2.1K New Ideas
- 617 The Flea Market
- 8K Software
- 3 SmartSDR+
- 6.3K SmartSDR for Windows
- 174 SmartSDR for Maestro and M models
- 413 SmartSDR for Mac
- 267 SmartSDR for iOS
- 252 SmartSDR CAT
- 188 DAX
- 375 SmartSDR API
- 9.2K Radios and Accessories
- 23 Aurora
- 217 FLEX-8000 Signature Series
- 7.1K FLEX-6000 Signature Series
- 923 Maestro
- 53 FlexControl
- 860 FLEX Series (Legacy) Radios
- 897 Genius Products
- 456 Power Genius XL Amplifier
- 325 Tuner Genius XL
- 116 Antenna Genius
- 285 Shack Infrastructure
- 200 Networking
- 445 Remote Operation (SmartLink)
- 138 Contesting
- 758 Peripherals & Station Integration
- 139 Amateur Radio Interests
- 978 Third-Party Software