Welcome to the FlexRadio Community! Please review the new Community Rules and other important new Community information on the Message Board.
Need the latest SmartSDR or 4O3A Genius Product Software?
SmartSDR v4.1.5 | SmartSDR v4.1.5 Release Notes
SmartSDR v3.10.15 | SmartSDR v3.10.15 Release Notes
The latest 4O3A Genius Product Software and Firmware
SmartSDR v4.1.5 | SmartSDR v4.1.5 Release Notes
SmartSDR v3.10.15 | SmartSDR v3.10.15 Release Notes
The latest 4O3A Genius Product Software and Firmware
If you are having a problem, please refer to the product documentation or check the Help Center for known solutions.
Need technical support from FlexRadio? It's as simple as Creating a HelpDesk ticket.
Need technical support from FlexRadio? It's as simple as Creating a HelpDesk ticket.
Remote Operation using Starlink - Performance Report
widowsson_N6ATC
Member ✭✭
If anyone is interested in latency using Starlink (remote connection via SoftEther to my 6600/PGXL/TGXL) from a gigabit Cox cable connection, here you go.
It works. It's not flawless, but it works.
My shack is in my other house 110 miles north of me as the crow flies. If I had a wired Internet connection (as opposed to LEO satellites), it would be rock solid. As it is, using Starlink, it is "mostly ok". I rate it 65% perfect for rag-chewing. Definitely not acceptable for contesting. Expect some dropouts. But I have had signal reports of "excellent, perfect audio". I probably should have recorded them!
EDIT: my grade may have been a bit harsh. There are times it is 75% perfect, which I think is good considering the use of Starlink. This proves that perfectly acceptable operation is possible. Plus, in my location, I have obstructions to an open-sky view. Starlink will tell you that obstructions are deadly, and you'll get lots of interruptions. We rarely get them streaming video TV services. But, for ham radio use, it's much more of a factor. The next comment shows my obstruction picture.
It works. It's not flawless, but it works.
My shack is in my other house 110 miles north of me as the crow flies. If I had a wired Internet connection (as opposed to LEO satellites), it would be rock solid. As it is, using Starlink, it is "mostly ok". I rate it 65% perfect for rag-chewing. Definitely not acceptable for contesting. Expect some dropouts. But I have had signal reports of "excellent, perfect audio". I probably should have recorded them!
EDIT: my grade may have been a bit harsh. There are times it is 75% perfect, which I think is good considering the use of Starlink. This proves that perfectly acceptable operation is possible. Plus, in my location, I have obstructions to an open-sky view. Starlink will tell you that obstructions are deadly, and you'll get lots of interruptions. We rarely get them streaming video TV services. But, for ham radio use, it's much more of a factor. The next comment shows my obstruction picture.
1
Comments
-
My obstructions. Red is bad. Blue is good. The red is from 60-foot Ponderosa pine trees.0
-
And... here is an image showing latency from my router to the Internet over a 24-hour period using Starlink, on the network where the Flex equipment is located.0
Leave a Comment
Categories
- All Categories
- 386 Community Topics
- 2.2K New Ideas
- 650 The Flea Market
- 8.4K Software
- 151 SmartSDR+
- 6.5K SmartSDR for Windows
- 189 SmartSDR for Maestro and M models
- 437 SmartSDR for Mac
- 274 SmartSDR for iOS
- 263 SmartSDR CAT
- 202 DAX
- 383 SmartSDR API
- 9.4K Radios and Accessories
- 48 Aurora
- 289 FLEX-8000 Signature Series
- 7.2K FLEX-6000 Signature Series
- 964 Maestro
- 58 FlexControl
- 866 FLEX Series (Legacy) Radios
- 936 Genius Products
- 467 Power Genius XL Amplifier
- 343 Tuner Genius XL
- 126 Antenna Genius
- 306 Shack Infrastructure
- 215 Networking
- 466 Remote Operation (SmartLink)
- 144 Contesting
- 804 Peripherals & Station Integration
- 143 Amateur Radio Interests
- 1K Third-Party Software