Welcome to the new FlexRadio Community! Please review the new Community Rules and other important new Community information on the Message Board.
Need the latest SmartSDR, Power Genius, Tuner Genius and Antenna Genius Software?
SmartSDR v3.8.20 and the SmartSDR v3.8.20 Release Notes
SmartSDR v2.12.1 and the SmartSDR v2.12.1 Release Notes
Power Genius XL Utility v3.8.9 and the Power Genius XL Release Notes v3.8.9
Tuner Genius XL Utility v1.2.11 and the Tuner Genius XL Release Notes v1.2.11
Antenna Genius Utility v4.1.8
SmartSDR v3.8.20 and the SmartSDR v3.8.20 Release Notes
SmartSDR v2.12.1 and the SmartSDR v2.12.1 Release Notes
Power Genius XL Utility v3.8.9 and the Power Genius XL Release Notes v3.8.9
Tuner Genius XL Utility v1.2.11 and the Tuner Genius XL Release Notes v1.2.11
Antenna Genius Utility v4.1.8
If you are having a problem, please refer to the product documentation or check the Help Center for known solutions.
Need technical support from FlexRadio? It's as simple as Creating a HelpDesk ticket.
Need technical support from FlexRadio? It's as simple as Creating a HelpDesk ticket.
v3 Upgrade Price for Less than One Year Owners
Comments
-
Some may think Gerald is not telling the truth about the cost od software dev. But he did state that the cost of software dev is the most expensive part of the business, and that the $200.00 for an upgrade is a long way away from covering the dev cost. They depend on hardware sales to cover the cost.
Gerald also said that he considers Flex to be a software company. The reason makes sense. Developing the hardware for a new radio may take a year or two then it's all finished for several years. Untill they plan for another radio. But software is every day all year for as long as there are Flex radios. It never ends and is never completed. But hardware is.
I don't know how much support there is here to sway Flex to change their pricing policy, but I can't see it change no matter what is said here. The numbers just are not there. This policy has been very good for Flex and it is working very well. If it wasn't then Gerald would have made changes a long time ago.1 -
1
-
God help me Kevin... haha0
-
Wayne, your post is full of holes. First, minor software upgrades or updates do in fact at times give you new features. Major upgrades like Windows 7 to Windows 10 absolutely give you new features if that's what you mean by "gadgets". This doesn't really make any difference since we're talking about two different products and business models. By the way, MS will end support for an OS at some point (years) down the road but that is after supporting the version with updates and security fixes during that time (even with new versions like 10 being out) but at some point yes they do sunset the OS. They can't support it forever and you have to move on at some point. But that's not the reason for this post.
Also, if you think your 6700 will last another 7 years and through new major versions of SSDR without having to upgrade to a new radio hardware version, you sir are in for a rude awakening. The same thing will happen to Flex 6000 series as they do in the computer arena, at some point the hardware will not support the software features and then if you want the new software features you'll have to upgrade to a new model radio. Look at the 1500 and 5000... right?
I don't agree with the argument some people want to bring up about the other radio manufacturers. They are not the same. You can't compare a firmware update on those to a software update like we have with Flex. The beauty of Flex is just that, new features, enhancements and bug fixes are seen in the software. Let's take for instance the band buttons in SSDR. I think the currently selected band should be highlighted somehow like with a different color, when you go into the Band pop-out. That is a software fix that can be easily done. If I wanted a light to light up on a physical band button on say the Kenwood TS-590SG, it would be impossible to do via firmware or software update. The hardware doesn't have an LED there at all. SDR's bring in a new way of thinking. You kind of get what you get when you buy something other than a Flex. It's up front and known when you buy it. Not really the same with Flex.0 -
I'll add another thought to something mentioned above. Doesn't Flex have a commercial side of the business? Probably government contracts it looks like? I can't believe Flex is hurting when it comes to software development. That's just my uneducated guess. But I digress...0
-
Now... let me get back to FT8 and killing the hobby and doing mindless button pushing. haha2
-
Ha! I'm trying to get BG3UPA's attention on 20 FT8 right now. S. Korea was up a few minutes ago. So far, nada.1
-
Oh yeah, I saw him one time in band activity... good luck!!! I'm on the East coast0
-
6
-
The coffee feature. That ends all arguments. Where do I sign up?0
-
This SILLY ARGUMENT has been raging here since about 2012 when Flex first announced their annual software fee. Flex quickly changed to a $200 version upgrade fee but the howls have not diminished Let’s face it HAMS ARE CHEAP and most hams do not understand that these days the product cost in not the hardware but rather it’s the software that is expensive to build. Part of the reason is you can touch hardware but only see software work So I expect at this SILLY ARGUMENT will continue to rage here for years to come and everyone on both sides will be outraged that the other side does not get their point.7
-
I don't mind purchasing "upgrades & new features" but bug fixes should be free for life but that's just my opinion. Being a new 6600 owner I really miss all the features of PowerSDR that my 5000 has. Ya, they need to make $$$$$ to continue with development and pay the bills.1
-
After paying to upgrade to version 3.alpha for each test radio to participate as an Alpha tester I’m thinking the program as standing will continue. Nice thought but the can of worms on individual relative value added by changing cost options would be chaotic. FRS is good in my book running with the announced program as is. There is no other position that is any better for everybody (including FRS). Thinking that those who have an appreciation of the version 3 features will be very satisfied. The upgrade is very “non-trivial” so I’m expecting some interesting challenges as version 3 rolls out when the greater variety of configurations is upgraded. But know the alphas and FRS are “forging” the new release hammering hard at every aspect they can. 73 Steve K9ZW0
-
Paul’ My point was that this same theme with minor variations keeps on recurring over and over and over again. We all get it. HAMS ARE CHEAP. NOBODY LIKES PAYING FOR INTANGIBLES LIKE SOFTWARE. Fact of life. It costs a lot of money to produce software. Yes some people have limited budgets so $200 after spending thousands of dollars on ham gear may feel expensive especially since it could be spent on tangibles like ****. But like steak. Do you go to the butcher asking for a discount because you bought a steak knife last year? Somebody has got to pay for the software. Development costs. Full Disclosure: I paid $200 for my copy of V3 so I could participate in Alpha testing I have watched months and months of labor going into development. Last time I heard that none of the software guys work for free or get 1/2 their pay because they were on payroll last year Yes it’s a silly argument because it reoccurs every time a new release is on the horizon.2
-
Steve, I hope Flex is giving the Alpha testers a discount on the release version. Seems odd that you'd pay for an Alpha version when you're doing the testing. Should be the other way around. Nice blog by the way.1
-
1
-
7
-
The alpha list is a very selective group. I've requested to be a tester and was denied. I suspect there are more than enough testers and so additional ones are not needed.0
-
Alpha testers pay the same as the entire flex community does, with the caveat that what is provided in the beginning of the development cycle is very raw.. in fact the entire process of paying and activating the software is a component of the alpha test itself, so the process including fulfillment is well tested and smooth upon its final release.
0 -
Chris, ouch! Not trying to start an argument but I couldn't agree to paying to test new alpha versions, especially alpha, very raw is right. See, this is a different topic but alpha/beta testers should not have to pay at all, that's crazy to me. I could see not getting a perk like discounted release version but to actually pay? Wow.1
-
Thanks HCampbell, see this is the kind of reply that is helpful. I've never seen or read this before so it answers many questions. I wish the people who have been in this community for a long time would give us "newbies" a bit of a break if we ask questions that have been discussed in the past. We may not realize the history and reason for stuff like this.3
-
Scott, Sorry I missed your question, I'm glad HCampbell looked this up as I ran out of time.
Any comments I make on this community are not usually my opinions but well researched answers from past Flex comments.
This is the reason I said that the upgrade cost does not cover the cost of software dev...I was aware of this reply from Gerald.
This is why I mentioned several of Geralds comments as a referance.
As I see it , there are really never bad questions, keep them comming.2 -
Hey it's all cool Bill. I'll try and do a better job of searching for the same topics before posting a new one. Sometimes it's time consuming and hard to find replies on this type of community board. Replies get nested here and there and makes it hard to keep up with the replies and follow the thread.
I agree... the only bad or dumb question is the one not asked.1 -
4
-
Scot and Paul I keep coming back to this thread seeing the same points. I too am not trying to insight an argument but I really think you're too hung up on money. I seriously think if Flex did things your way they would find theirselves out of business in short order. I also realize you will likely continue trying to convince me again continuing with the same argument meaning you're not interested in my opinion. The system is with right as it stands imo. This debate is getting old. Does this really need to drag on because you're unhappy? Again, not trying to start something, asking for it to end.1
-
2
-
Rock and Roll!0
-
0
-
Of course you do.0
-
There is really no reason to ask for a discussion to end or a thread closed unless the replies start to become personal attacks. If we don't like the topic or it seems to drag on too long,,then I suggest simply turn the channel to something eles.
Most discussions die out on there own for lack of interest, but as long as some keep posting, it lives. The life span will take care of itself.
For me the cost of owning a Flex radio boils down to this. If one feels that Flex no longer gives good value for the dollar then we have a dicision to make.
At this time V3 has little to offer me, but that's fine with me, I don't need to upgrade. My radio operation here will continue to be the same without it, nothing changes for me.
Even without the upgrate I still feel my radio gives me great value for the money spent. I think everyone feels the same way because they still have their Flex radio's.1
Leave a Comment
Categories
- All Categories
- 294 Community Topics
- 2.1K New Ideas
- 538 The Flea Market
- 7.6K Software
- 6K SmartSDR for Windows
- 139 SmartSDR for Maestro and M models
- 337 SmartSDR for Mac
- 251 SmartSDR for iOS
- 226 SmartSDR CAT
- 175 DAX
- 345 SmartSDR API
- 8.8K Radios and Accessories
- 7K FLEX-6000 Signature Series
- 46 FLEX-8000 Signature Series
- 860 Maestro
- 45 FlexControl
- 838 FLEX Series (Legacy) Radios
- 809 Genius Products
- 401 Power Genius XL Amplifier
- 280 Tuner Genius XL
- 89 Antenna Genius
- 246 Shack Infrastructure
- 168 Networking
- 377 Remote Operation (SmartLink)
- 119 Contesting
- 593 Peripherals & Station Integration
- 116 Amateur Radio Interests
- 880 Third-Party Software