Welcome to the new FlexRadio Community! Please review the new Community Rules and other important new Community information on the Message Board.
Need the latest SmartSDR, Power Genius, Tuner Genius and Antenna Genius Software?
SmartSDR v3.8.20 and the SmartSDR v3.8.20 Release Notes
SmartSDR v2.12.1 and the SmartSDR v2.12.1 Release Notes
Power Genius XL Utility v3.8.9 and the Power Genius XL Release Notes v3.8.9
Tuner Genius XL Utility v1.2.11 and the Tuner Genius XL Release Notes v1.2.11
Antenna Genius Utility v4.1.8
SmartSDR v3.8.20 and the SmartSDR v3.8.20 Release Notes
SmartSDR v2.12.1 and the SmartSDR v2.12.1 Release Notes
Power Genius XL Utility v3.8.9 and the Power Genius XL Release Notes v3.8.9
Tuner Genius XL Utility v1.2.11 and the Tuner Genius XL Release Notes v1.2.11
Antenna Genius Utility v4.1.8
If you are having a problem, please refer to the product documentation or check the Help Center for known solutions.
Need technical support from FlexRadio? It's as simple as Creating a HelpDesk ticket.
Need technical support from FlexRadio? It's as simple as Creating a HelpDesk ticket.
6400 Receive Antennas
k9bm .
Member ✭✭
0
Answers
-
0
-
So how does this, by anyone's common sense definition, constitute "2 independent receivers?"0
-
0
-
OK, I guess I'm too **** to own a Flex. It's FOR SALE, for anyone reading this, 3 months old in factory carton, automatic antenna tuner and hand microphone, $2,000 shipped in CONUS. I'm ordering an Icom 7610, it's $1,000 cheaper than a Flex 6600 and actually DOES have 2 "independent receivers" as far as I can determine. Please post if interested....0
-
0
-
0
-
0
-
1
-
1
-
Brad, One thing I did that allowed me to use HF dipoles and a 6 meter antenna at the same time on one antenna ports was to get a Comet CF-360 "duplexer" which splits one antenna into two ports - or combines two antennas into One port. One for 1.8-30 MHz, and the other for 49-470 MHz. I was able to use the antenna on two ports.
You might find that as a simple way to split your LP to allow using HF on ANT1 and 6 Meters on ANT2) giving you what you want.
I haven't done it this way, because I was combining two antennas into one port, but it should work.
Ken - NM9P0 -
Ken, that's a really good idea and I would jump on it if I wanted to sell my 160-6 meter solid state amp. But after scratching my head half the afternoon I just can't up with a way to configure a 6 meter antenna and an HF Yagi to use with the Flex 6400. All I want to do is monitor 6 while working HF, and I seriously feel someone at Flex should review the dictionary definition of "independent" and then revise their marketing of the 6400.
An "independent" receiver does not require the use of the same antenna as another receiver, it means 2 separate radios in the same box. We can talk esoterica all afternoon about spectral capture units and slices, but unless you're a well experienced SDR user or experimenter you will interpret the marketing claim of "2 independent receivers" exactly the same way I did....1 -
Brad, The 6400 is most similar to the 6300, 1 scu, 2 slices (receivers.) I started with the 6300 and honestly use my 6600 the same as I did the 6300. Similar to the Antenna Genius I use a SixPak . I set it up to receive on antenna 1 side of the switch and Transmit on the B side.but I am on the same band beit DXing or ragchwing. Two separate bands with two separate antennas is achieved with the 6600 and 6700 models. No disrespect but sounds like you're about to make another under researched decision.1
-
3
-
Thanks Craig, I did check and it appears you are correct. This is all WAY too much for what I'm looking to do. I think I'm better off just forgetting about 6 meters until I get a ping from a spotting reflector, or just use my old Icom 756PRO hooked up to NiMM which is perfectly capable of handling SO2R. In fact, I could buy 2 or 3 dial radios that can be computer interfaced before I would reach the cost of an SDR radio with 2 SCUs and true "independent receivers." I appreciate your help....1
-
Craig,
The IC-7610 Advanced Manual page 78 shows two ADCs with the ability to select a different antenna for each receiver. Is this incorrect?
73,
Doug K4DSP
0 -
Doug, I stand corrected. The review that I saw was wrong. However, the manuals are very brief and vague about dual receive operation. Others have suggested that it does not do full duplex. I would suspect that both receivers are muted when transmitting, which would mean that it would not work in an SO2R contesting situation. But as far as I could find, Icom doesn't say one way or the other.
p.s. I owned an IC-7600 for five years and loved it. But my 6500 is better.
0 -
I've never done so, but why can't you use the receive only input (RXA IN) or the transverter input (XVTR-A) for your 6M monitoring? You'd have to switch to the active transmit slice and change to the 6M band to transmit, though. The RXA IN port is receive only and goes directly into the same spectral capture unit (SCA) that your ANT 1 (slice A?) is connected to, but with no transmit capability. It will permit that receive only capability on a separate antenna, however.1
-
0
-
0
-
Your correct. Comment above is as clear a peanut butter.
I like you would assume independent receivers not slices.
Say what you mean or mean what you say. Customers can only believe what they read when no familiar with a product.0 -
It is more about understanding what SDR is and how it works. In SDR the number of SCUs and or ADCs tells you all you need to know about what a radio can do.0
-
whats wrong with advertising that is aimed to new users that might not understand. Not all users are engineers. As usual you take the simplistic fan boy answers.
The objective of advertising is to educate the uneducated and not give confusing information that spawns a discussion like this1 -
0
-
I hate to break it to you, but the objective of advertising is to sell product :-(3
-
0
-
3
-
I would never purchase a transceiver without first looking at a signal flow diagram for the radio. A very perfunctory review of the 6400/6600 signal flow in the 6400/6600 Hardware Manual shows immediately what the capabilities of the radios are. If someone with an amateur radio license cannot read such a diagram, they have no business operating a transceiver. Maybe that's a bit strong, but we really DO need to be a bit more than appliance operators.2
-
Yeah Ted, that is a bit strong. I was first licensed in 1967, I built my first homebrew electronic keyer that summer on the chassis of a scrapped 5-tube table radio. I made my living for a few decades as an RF Engineer designing cellular networks and microwave links. I thought I had researched SDR radios pretty well, I talked to a lot of hams, including some on this forum, and yes I relied upon some of Flex's marketing when they use common, nontechnical terms like "independent" and "receiver." Shame on me?
You can say I was uninformed, but do not call me an appliance operator. I was homebrewing ham gear decades before your parents met....1 -
0
-
CK722 - Germanium - the good old days....1
Leave a Comment
Categories
- All Categories
- 294 Community Topics
- 2.1K New Ideas
- 538 The Flea Market
- 7.6K Software
- 6K SmartSDR for Windows
- 139 SmartSDR for Maestro and M models
- 337 SmartSDR for Mac
- 251 SmartSDR for iOS
- 226 SmartSDR CAT
- 175 DAX
- 345 SmartSDR API
- 8.8K Radios and Accessories
- 7K FLEX-6000 Signature Series
- 46 FLEX-8000 Signature Series
- 860 Maestro
- 45 FlexControl
- 838 FLEX Series (Legacy) Radios
- 809 Genius Products
- 401 Power Genius XL Amplifier
- 280 Tuner Genius XL
- 89 Antenna Genius
- 246 Shack Infrastructure
- 168 Networking
- 377 Remote Operation (SmartLink)
- 119 Contesting
- 593 Peripherals & Station Integration
- 116 Amateur Radio Interests
- 880 Third-Party Software