Welcome to the new FlexRadio Community! Please review the new Community Rules and other important new Community information on the Message Board.
Need the latest SmartSDR, Power Genius, Tuner Genius and Antenna Genius Software?
SmartSDR v3.8.20 and the SmartSDR v3.8.20 Release Notes
SmartSDR v2.12.1 and the SmartSDR v2.12.1 Release Notes
Power Genius XL Utility v3.8.9 and the Power Genius XL Release Notes v3.8.9
Tuner Genius XL Utility v1.2.11 and the Tuner Genius XL Release Notes v1.2.11
Antenna Genius Utility v4.1.8
SmartSDR v3.8.20 and the SmartSDR v3.8.20 Release Notes
SmartSDR v2.12.1 and the SmartSDR v2.12.1 Release Notes
Power Genius XL Utility v3.8.9 and the Power Genius XL Release Notes v3.8.9
Tuner Genius XL Utility v1.2.11 and the Tuner Genius XL Release Notes v1.2.11
Antenna Genius Utility v4.1.8
If you are having a problem, please refer to the product documentation or check the Help Center for known solutions.
Need technical support from FlexRadio? It's as simple as Creating a HelpDesk ticket.
Need technical support from FlexRadio? It's as simple as Creating a HelpDesk ticket.
AGC-T - Backing off to reduce noise vs. advancing to hear noise
Duane N9DG
Member ✭✭
All of the below assumes that the proper level of pre-amplification was previously set to reach the band’s noise level. But not too much that needlessly amplifies the natural band noise. That is a topic for another thread.
I see a lot of AGC-T setting comments where the recommendation is to start with the control far to the right and back off until the band noise "noticeably drops". I do it the exact opposite way. I start with the control far to the left with no audible band noise, and then advance it to the right until there is a solid and distinctly perceptible atmospheric/natural band noise present and stop there. This is done at a “empty” spot on the band.
My rationale for that approach is that any signal right at the band noise level will be heard with that setting because I can also just hear the natural band noise that is present. So a weak signal at about that same level is also audible. Meanwhile backing off from the high side till the noise reduces you still don’t actually know how close you are to the natural band noise. As such the AGC will likely be acting on the band noise and potentially masking signals right at the noise floor.
Also if you advance from no perceptible band noise to where there is distinctly perceptible band noise, you will never get the rushing noise between CW elements or pauses in speech on SSB.
As for volume level of the weak signal with the above settings, that is what the volume control is for. AGC-T should never be used to try and set audio level of the signal being listened to. But I suspect a fair number of people try to use the AGC-T as a pseudo volume control. Please don’t do that.
Perhaps it is a terminology and semantics thing. And those who say back off from above actually do arrive at the same place anyhow. But to me it just seems easier to grasp what is happening with the AGC to advance it from no band noise heard to just a little being heard as band conditions call for.
The advance from no noise to solidly perceptible noise approach is what I have always used going back to the early SDR-1000 days and PowerSDR. And also with most analog radio RF gain controls too for that matter.
And at the end of the day the AGC-T setting for this quickly becomes second nature and most will reach a point where they just do it automatically without specifically thinking about it. But for those starting new, I suspect that many of them think more band noise heard means more sensitivity, when in reality that is not true at all.
I see a lot of AGC-T setting comments where the recommendation is to start with the control far to the right and back off until the band noise "noticeably drops". I do it the exact opposite way. I start with the control far to the left with no audible band noise, and then advance it to the right until there is a solid and distinctly perceptible atmospheric/natural band noise present and stop there. This is done at a “empty” spot on the band.
My rationale for that approach is that any signal right at the band noise level will be heard with that setting because I can also just hear the natural band noise that is present. So a weak signal at about that same level is also audible. Meanwhile backing off from the high side till the noise reduces you still don’t actually know how close you are to the natural band noise. As such the AGC will likely be acting on the band noise and potentially masking signals right at the noise floor.
Also if you advance from no perceptible band noise to where there is distinctly perceptible band noise, you will never get the rushing noise between CW elements or pauses in speech on SSB.
As for volume level of the weak signal with the above settings, that is what the volume control is for. AGC-T should never be used to try and set audio level of the signal being listened to. But I suspect a fair number of people try to use the AGC-T as a pseudo volume control. Please don’t do that.
Perhaps it is a terminology and semantics thing. And those who say back off from above actually do arrive at the same place anyhow. But to me it just seems easier to grasp what is happening with the AGC to advance it from no band noise heard to just a little being heard as band conditions call for.
The advance from no noise to solidly perceptible noise approach is what I have always used going back to the early SDR-1000 days and PowerSDR. And also with most analog radio RF gain controls too for that matter.
And at the end of the day the AGC-T setting for this quickly becomes second nature and most will reach a point where they just do it automatically without specifically thinking about it. But for those starting new, I suspect that many of them think more band noise heard means more sensitivity, when in reality that is not true at all.
3
Answers
-
Very good advice. The acc-t is one of the best aspects of the Flex. I use my Flexcontol to adjust it and the audio level which allows me to fine tune both quickly and easily. Thanks.1
-
I completely agree.
For real-time discussions
User created documentation.
Volunteer!!73, Jay - NO5J
0 -
Consider using the presence or lack of color noise in the pan adapter/waterfall. If you see random dots you have too much gain, regardless of what you hear.3
-
Definitely DXers in this thread. Sound advice from all.0
-
A related question - what do folks running FT8 do as far as AGC-T? It's not usually possible to hear weak signals that can be decoded, and I'm not sure if the waterfall or panadapter are useful either, so typically just set it around 40-45 and hope for the best.1
-
RF gain, or AGC-T, is something that needs to be actively managed at all times. This is not "set it and forget it". How much RF gain you need changes from band to band, day to day, and time of day. If you see too much color noise, i.e. random blue dots, you have too much RF gain.1
-
The AGC-T does not effect the display on the water fall or panadaper.
Adjusting the water fall gain in the display tab controls what you see on the waterfall.2 -
VA3WBT is correct. AGC-T and RF Gain are completely different AGC is in the audio chain and does not affect the waterfall. RF Gain and/or preamps (depending on your radio model) will affect the display although much of the effect will be filtered out over time. However, Varistor is also correct in stating that there is no set it and forget it setting for AGC-T. That is why I have one of the buttons on my Flexcontrol configured to adjust AGC-T. Hope this helps.1
-
I agree with both of you, but again, from a practical standpoint, what is the best way at a given time to determine how to set the AGC-T? Do I still go by ear, and assume it's also correct for the digital signals?1
-
I don't do much FT8 so I am not sure about this,,does the AGC-t effect digital modes?
Yes you set the AGC-t by listening to the noise floor,,just at the point of the noise going down or a tiny bit more is the sweet spot.1 -
With WSJT-X, I set the DAX channel gain at 50% (Default), AGC Fast, or Off (if there are really strong FT8 signal in the passband). My threshold level varies between 27% and 36%.
I also pay attention to the audio level indicator in WSJT-X, ensuring that with my 3k passband tuned to the nearest quiet, signal free area on that same band results in the WSJT-X level meter reading about 30 dB, which is why I vary the AGC-T threshold level. This results in signals that are not visible on either SmartSDR's or WSJT-X's waterfalls, still being decoded.
I adjust both waterfall color gain levels so that very little, but some of the noise remains visible. If I'm missing any decodes they would be signals I can't see, or hear. IOW they are undecodable, if they exist at all.
It's a little more work, but it works!For real-time discussions
User created documentation.
Volunteer!!73, Jay - NO5J
0 -
Ken
Agreed. The AGC Off setting might behave like a legacy RF gain control, but it's definitely not an RF gain control, because it's not controlling RF, the AGC-T function is being done in the AF stage of the receiver.For real-time discussions
User created documentation.
Volunteer!!73, Jay - NO5J
0 -
For FT-8, I set the AGC "aggressiveness" to SLOW and set the AGC-T for optimal SNR based on the band noise background I am hearing from the speakers. I then adjust the DAX RX gain so that I get a 30 dB signal level in WSJT-X.
Don't set AGC-T from quiet to hearing noise; you are now increasing the gain of the noise which is not the optimal SNR. You do not want the AGC to amplify noise1 -
0
Leave a Comment
Categories
- All Categories
- 260 Community Topics
- 2.1K New Ideas
- 538 The Flea Market
- 7.6K Software
- 6K SmartSDR for Windows
- 147 SmartSDR for Maestro and M models
- 367 SmartSDR for Mac
- 242 SmartSDR for iOS
- 236 SmartSDR CAT
- 175 DAX
- 345 SmartSDR API
- 8.8K Radios and Accessories
- 7K FLEX-6000 Signature Series
- 43 FLEX-8000 Signature Series
- 859 Maestro
- 43 FlexControl
- 837 FLEX Series (Legacy) Radios
- 807 Genius Products
- 424 Power Genius XL Amplifier
- 280 Tuner Genius XL
- 87 Antenna Genius
- 227 Shack Infrastructure
- 153 Networking
- 409 Remote Operation (SmartLink)
- 119 Contesting
- 639 Peripherals & Station Integration
- 116 Amateur Radio Interests
- 821 Third-Party Software