Welcome to the new FlexRadio Community! Please review the new Community Rules and other important new Community information on the Message Board.
If you are having a problem, please refer to the product documentation or check the Help Center for known solutions.
Need technical support from FlexRadio? It's as simple as Creating a HelpDesk ticket.

antenna selection

G8ZPX
G8ZPX Member
edited June 2020 in SmartSDR for Windows
Okay, two slices open. slice 1 on ANT1/1 on 20m band. Slice 2 open on 50.110.

When I select antenna RX antenna 2 on the second slice (6m band) it also switches the antenna selection of slice 1 to ANT2, thus making it impossible to listen to 2 different bands with 2 different antennas. God knows how crazy this situation would get with more slices open. You can never be certain which antenna is selected without visually checking the screen.

Comments

  • G4NRT
    G4NRT Member ✭✭
    edited January 2018
    Unless you have the 6700 then that is life I am afraid.  It is documented although I do not have the manual to hand to look it up!

    David G4NRT
  • Dave Dave
    Dave Dave Member ✭✭
    edited March 2017
    6300 and 6500 have only one receiver.....you can use different transmitting antennas.

    Personally I was very disappointed when I discovered the same thing, almost as much as no basic squelch.
  • Martin AA6E
    Martin AA6E Member ✭✭✭
    edited June 2020
    The 6500 (or 6300) really has only one receiver, so only one receive antenna (at a time).  Flex confuses the story by using the term "SCU" (spectral capture unit) instead of "receiver".  You might think of a "slice" as being a receiver, but your 1-4 slices are more like sub-receivers, working off the output of the SCU.  (The critical part of the SCU is the analog-to-digital converter, and the 6500 has only one.)

    Many antennas have enough response off resonance to be useful for receive purposes, so you can monitor multiple bands through the single antenna port.
  • Steve G1XOW
    Steve G1XOW Member ✭✭
    edited July 2016
    Yes okay, it was a dumb question. But then I have to ask what is the point of putting multiple antenna jacks on the radio at all?   Would be easier and cheaper just to use an external 1/2/3 switch. At least that way there is no confusion and everyone would know what is (or ins't) going on.
  • Burch - K4QXX
    Burch - K4QXX Member ✭✭
    edited June 2016
    Many of my old Icom/Yaesu/Kenwood radios all have two antenna jacks but only had one receiver.  I would always hook up my 6 meter antenna to one and my HF antenna to the other.  Much easier and less complicated than using external cables and antenna switches.  My old Flex-5000a had 3 antenna jacks.  I used one for my StepIR vertical, one for 6 meters, and one for my 160 meter inverted L.  When I changed bands, the antenna port changed.  Much easier and more efficient than using an external switch.
    
  • Ken - NM9P
    Ken - NM9P Member ✭✭✭
    edited December 2016
    The advantage to having multiple antenna connectors on the rig is that you can program the rig to automatically select the antenna depending upon which band you're in. It also allows you to change between antennas using the rig's control software. You can't do that with external antenna switches, unless they are the expensive ones.
  • Steve G1XOW
    Steve G1XOW Member ✭✭
    edited July 2016
    Ken, Good point if it actually worked like that (which currently it doesn't). Antenna switching presently follows slices, not frequencies, nor pre-allocated antenna/amp combinations.

    It only works that way if driven via the band selection buttons (requires extra clicks too). It doesn't work if the freq is entered manually nor does it work if the freq is provided to SSDR by any other app such as HRD, FLdigi, M1MM etc.
  • Tim - W4TME
    Tim - W4TME Administrator, FlexRadio Employee admin
    edited December 2016
    Dave - I understand that for you, having a squelch to use on non-FM modes is important, but, and I say this with all the respect in the world, you have made your point and expressed your disappointment in excess. Constant reiteration of your opinion over this feature not currently being in the current code every time you post has no affect regarding the prioritization of this planned feature.

    For the record, we have the request in our enhancement database.  We intend to implement a squelch feature that is more advanced than a threshold based reverse gate.  Thank you.
  • Al K0VM
    Al K0VM Member ✭✭✭
    edited May 2020
    I use a 6m-hf diplxer that allows me to monitor/work on 6m antenna while working HF on other HF antenna.

    AL, K0VM
  • G4NRT
    G4NRT Member ✭✭
    edited December 2016
    Interesting Al. Would you mind letting me have the details. Perhaps you would reply direct so as not to hi-jack Steve's thread! David G4NRT
  • G8ZPX
    G8ZPX Member
    edited July 2016
    Al, would also appreciate detail on the Diplexor. I have a SteppIR for 40-10m (which also provides a pathetic dipole on 6m), however, I also have a dedicated 7 element yagi for 6m above it.
  • dlwarnberg
    dlwarnberg Member ✭✭
    edited June 2016
    Steve...  DIAMOND MX62M Duplexer

    http://www.diamondantenna.net/Product_Catalog/plexers.html

    Or

    Comet CF-360  A or B model might be more along the lines your looking for
  • Keith Ferguson
    edited June 2016
    I do this  - it works really well. A similar approach lets you receive 4 metres at the same time as the HF bands, but it's a little more complicated (to allow for including a 4m PA in the transmit path). The diplexer is just one of the off-the-shelf Japanese units.
  • G8ZPX
    G8ZPX Member
    edited July 2016
    David,

    Thanks for that. Not sure 600W PEP is good enough, too close to the **** I feel.

    I run full QRO on HF and 6m. If a Diplexer fails it would make a very expensive door-stop out of your Flex. Need a real QRO solution ideally. I may consider making cavity resonators out of 1/8 hard line. Messy and bulky but crash-proof.

  • Jay -- N0FB
    Jay -- N0FB Member ✭✭
    edited June 2020
    The antenna selection for a single SCU can only have one active antenna connection no matter how many slices are being displayed or listened to.  So for now, the software, as far as I can tell, is working as designed. This is not a problem, per-se except with your understanding of what is happening under the hood.

    Maybe instead of having this thread listed as a "problem", you could create an "idea" thread.  You could then purpose what new feature you would like to see.  The rest of us could then poke holes in the idea and/or make it better.  Then the folks at FlexRadio could, if they chose, add it to their stack-of-stuff to develop for a future release.

    I'd like to think that I always approach issues like this with the assumption that I know much less than the person or team who designed and built the product.  There are usually really good reasons why things work the way that they do and I'm just ignorant of that reason.
  • Ken - NM9P
    Ken - NM9P Member ✭✭✭
    edited December 2016
  • Dave Dave
    Dave Dave Member ✭✭
    edited June 2016
  • Tim - W4TME
    Tim - W4TME Administrator, FlexRadio Employee admin
    edited December 2016
    There are several topics where a FlexRadio employee has responded to this request and clearly communicated intent and direction.

    I acknowledge the request for this feature 11 months ago, of which you were active on the thread.  https://community.flexradio.com/flexradio/topics/squelch-for-all-modes

    My response...

    "A squelch feature for non-FM modes is on our enhancements list of things to do.  It just hasn't risen to the top of the heap yet."

    And I do not comment on feature priorities or timelines unless the feature's release is imminent.
  • KY6LA_Howard
    KY6LA_Howard Member ✭✭✭
    edited June 2016
    As I tell my XYL. I HEARD YOU THE FIRST TIME Nag me enough and it will NEVER get fixed. Of. Course, there are always unintended consequences if I say that too loud to my XYL.
  • Mike W8MM
    Mike W8MM Member ✭✭
    edited December 2016
    If you have the luxury of two different QRO amps (1 on HF, 1 on 6), you might put the diplexer between the radio and the amps.  Then the diplexer only needs a 100 watt power rating.

    I can also imagine a coaxial relay contraption (a bit like a stack match) that could make a single HF+6 amp work with a diplexer on receive.
  • Steve G1XOW
    Steve G1XOW Member ✭✭
    edited July 2016
    Good point Mike, thanks, I will try that.

    Another option may be the antenna Genius. I had previously shunned that as another bit of external **** that I shouldn't really need, but obviously I do. SSDR could be so much better in this regard but contesting is apparently more important.

Leave a Comment

Rich Text Editor. To edit a paragraph's style, hit tab to get to the paragraph menu. From there you will be able to pick one style. Nothing defaults to paragraph. An inline formatting menu will show up when you select text. Hit tab to get into that menu. Some elements, such as rich link embeds, images, loading indicators, and error messages may get inserted into the editor. You may navigate to these using the arrow keys inside of the editor and delete them with the delete or backspace key.