Welcome to the new FlexRadio Community! Please review the new Community Rules and other important new Community information on the Message Board.
Need the latest SmartSDR, Power Genius, Tuner Genius and Antenna Genius Software?
SmartSDR v3.8.20 and the SmartSDR v3.8.20 Release Notes
SmartSDR v2.12.1 and the SmartSDR v2.12.1 Release Notes
Power Genius XL Utility v3.8.9 and the Power Genius XL Release Notes v3.8.9
Tuner Genius XL Utility v1.2.11 and the Tuner Genius XL Release Notes v1.2.11
Antenna Genius Utility v4.1.8
SmartSDR v3.8.20 and the SmartSDR v3.8.20 Release Notes
SmartSDR v2.12.1 and the SmartSDR v2.12.1 Release Notes
Power Genius XL Utility v3.8.9 and the Power Genius XL Release Notes v3.8.9
Tuner Genius XL Utility v1.2.11 and the Tuner Genius XL Release Notes v1.2.11
Antenna Genius Utility v4.1.8
If you are having a problem, please refer to the product documentation or check the Help Center for known solutions.
Need technical support from FlexRadio? It's as simple as Creating a HelpDesk ticket.
Need technical support from FlexRadio? It's as simple as Creating a HelpDesk ticket.
PCI SDR Rig
Alex_KM5YT
Member ✭✭
At winradio.com (WR-G35DDCi 'EXCALIBUR Ultra) they have a PCI-interface shortwave
receiver. I think this would be a very nice idea for a FLEX rig - a direct bus interface, even though it does require a tower config, and one has to be serious about the RFI issues.
receiver. I think this would be a very nice idea for a FLEX rig - a direct bus interface, even though it does require a tower config, and one has to be serious about the RFI issues.
0
Comments
-
I often look at the high price tag for various "professional receivers" and then wonder what I could purchase for that money. Our local emporium had a used receiver with a price tag of £7000. Now dont get me wrong, I appreciate all the technical stuff that goes into the box, but still, a receiver for 7k, when one could purchase a flex for half that price. Maybe its just me getting old and more grumpier by the second.
73
John
1 -
John - I searched - somewhere (?) - and had the idea the price of the Winrad PCI unit was near $1000 USD - but if that unit is ~ 7000 GBP, it's a bit off the deep end. I am more imagining Flex putting something like a 3000 equivalent into a PCI board.
73,
Alex / KM5YT0 -
Hi, well even at $1000 for a receiver is a high price. I was merely pointing out the price for receivers only compared to a transceiver. I think the flex transceivers have a good enough receiver section , unless you want something better at low frequency's. Why do you want to interface a XCALIBUR Ultra TO A FLEX ?
0 -
What I want is for FLEX to consider producing a PCI-board configuration of an SDR transceiver. If I didn't express that clearly in the original post, my apologies.0
-
Ok, all understood, early morning brain drain apologies. If you mean a plug in flex pci card with everything onboard, then it may not be possible for one reason and that being it would need to be wrapped in an aluminium box for use as a heatshield. The space limits inside a computer around the slots would also not help either. How ever, if you meant a pci adapter on the back of current flex transceivers, then it may be possible.
What advantages would it give the user ?
0 -
I meant an integral unit as the winradio appears. Advantages: control convenience; low-profile station (fewer boxes & cables; discrete). Thermal can be an issue - Peltier effect cooling could be a
compact (if ~high-current) solution. Streamlined PC-SDR communication: DMA could be used.0 -
Interesting thoughts. Only a few small shielded sections.
Up to Antenna AD needs protection from internal PC noise
Everything up to DA for transmitter is digital - unshielded
DA out may/may not need shielding. Only need enough power to drive external amplifier - Say QRP 5W on card and external PA option.
73
Stan
0 -
for what I call desktop computers, it would need to be shielded and with new devices coming out which can serve multiple purposes, it may be easier and more compact.
0 -
Well, first of all, you'd want to make it PCI Express, not PCI. The easiest way I can think of to do this would be to have the radio card duplicate the bus-level (register) interface of a well know NIC. In that case, everything on the host side could remain unchanged. That's a big change for the Flex hardware/firmware all around. And I'm not sure what it would gain, frankly. Peter K1PGV0
-
I have tried a WinRadio PCI card once and am happy with my external WinRadio, which I use as a test receiver nowadays. The WinRadio system as a SDR is quite "old" but I am happy with it's recording abilities.
Reason I had problems with a PCI card: lots of interference, birdies, you name it. Couldn't get the PC quiet enough.
73,
Alex0 -
PCIe subsumed. After firewire, then ethernet, PCI is no great leap of communications abstraction; I see no conceptual change - and see DMA data transfer as a big plus. My only thought in this topic was for discussion. After that it's up to Flex marketing and engineering.0
-
Well, it IS an interesting point for discussion.
I see no conceptual change - and see DMA data transfer as a big plus
The problem is... where do you DMA the data to? What software in the host system is going to (a) allocate the memory for and setup the radio device registers to perform the transfer, and (b) receive the data and get it over to SmartSDR?
Right now, SSDR talks to the network to control the radio and get audio. You either have to write a custom device driver for the radio and change the bottom edge interface for SSDR, or find some way to mimic an existing interface so that SSDR still things it's getting data from the network.
You'd wind-up with *much* lower latency (from radio to host... but is that even important?), but probably not much less of a CPU load.
You'd lose the market of people who want to remote to the radio without a computer at the remote location.
If you were willing to re-write SSDR, you *could* push a *ton* more data between the radio and SSDR... get significantly higher resolution in the panadapter.
It's an interesting concept, but I personally don't see any significant advantages.
0 -
do we want to move into "pulling callsigns out of the ether" like wsjt,with a higher resolution panadapter with say a deep search facility. I can only see an improvement on the uWave bands as HF is too crowded but narrow filters could remove a lot of the crud.
0 -
I did not propose the idea with the thought of replacing the network interface - just as a configuration option which Flex would decide. I see a DMA interface as simpler and tidier than any network logic I can recall (I don't actively play with machine-level stuff anymore) - but the advent of optical networking on the Flexs will outrun that, too, soon enough.0
Leave a Comment
Categories
- All Categories
- 292 Community Topics
- 2.1K New Ideas
- 537 The Flea Market
- 7.5K Software
- 6K SmartSDR for Windows
- 146 SmartSDR for Maestro and M models
- 363 SmartSDR for Mac
- 250 SmartSDR for iOS
- 231 SmartSDR CAT
- 174 DAX
- 355 SmartSDR API
- 8.8K Radios and Accessories
- 7K FLEX-6000 Signature Series
- 41 FLEX-8000 Signature Series
- 851 Maestro
- 44 FlexControl
- 848 FLEX Series (Legacy) Radios
- 803 Genius Products
- 421 Power Genius XL Amplifier
- 279 Tuner Genius XL
- 103 Antenna Genius
- 245 Shack Infrastructure
- 167 Networking
- 405 Remote Operation (SmartLink)
- 130 Contesting
- 635 Peripherals & Station Integration
- 125 Amateur Radio Interests
- 875 Third-Party Software