Welcome to the new FlexRadio Community! Please review the new Community Rules and other important new Community information on the Message Board.
If you are having a problem, please check the Help Center for known solutions.
Need technical support from FlexRadio? It's as simple as Creating a HelpDesk ticket.


Ed bakerEd baker Member
Wiring up my modem into the db15 plug I noticed that pin 4 can be used for CW?? and FSK?? If so when . Or How ?? There presently are modems out there that can provide this type of control.

Completed · Last Updated


  • GregGreg Member ✭✭
    edited December 2013
    The radio does not yet do FSK...at least SmartSDR does not list FSK as a mode. I've asked about this before but have not seen an answer. So I have been using the FSK pins as a CW input from my external Winkey. 73 Greg
  • Ed bakerEd baker Member
    edited September 2016
    Yes I too use it presently as a CW key input. However RTTY using FSK , given the way some hams set their audio drive for RTTY using AFSK Well it is just better. Lets see there is hardware in the 6500/6700 to do this. There is plenty of space in the Menu LSB, USB, CW ,AM ,DIGU, DIGL (FM) WHY Not RTTY OR FSK .
  • Gerald-K5SDRGerald-K5SDR FlexRadio Employee ✭✭
    edited April 2019
    We have the hardware to do FSK but the software/FPGA coding is the pacing item. I don't have a date yet.
  • Ed bakerEd baker Member
    edited April 3
    Had to sleep on that answer . And I really don,t want to sound nasty .Please forgive me. It should have been functional 6 months ago.
  • Gerald-K5SDRGerald-K5SDR FlexRadio Employee ✭✭
    edited December 2016
    Ed, we are the only amateur radio manufacturer committed to continuous software improvement in our products. We have been doing this for over 10 years now. As an example we are releasing PowerSDR v2.7.1 for our earlier products that even adds new features to radios we no longer manufacture (FLEX-5000). I wish I could snap my finger and have every feature that everyone wanted yesterday, but the limited size of the amateur radio market means that we have a finite number of engineers. We have to prioritize those finite resources. At this moment, fully integrated DAX is considered by the vast majority of our customers to be more important than hardware FSK. We will implement hardware FSK but I just don't know which release it will be in at the time of this writing. We do release planning at the beginning of each release cycle. v1.1 release planning was done in early October right after v1.0 came out. Note that the community can vote this feature up in this thread if it is considered to be important. We do review the voting as we plan new releases.
  • Ed bakerEd baker Member
    edited September 2016
    I asked about FSK , not DAX or what the next release will bring to the table. You now have told me that someday it will happen . I just hope it's within my lifetime . So now !!! As a reason for the software issue I must say If your finite number of software people arn't up to or slow to the task .There are ones capable of software/FPGA coding out there . And it is not the daily internal releases that you gauge success with it is successful releases . Right now it is pretty anemic. I'll bet if you took a community vote on when the advertised functions should be there . It would be unanimous yesterday ! . . .
  • Ed, K0KCEd, K0KC Member
    edited June 2014
    Hey...as they say in Texas about driving..."post friendly". Ed, K0KC
  • Ed bakerEd baker Member
    edited September 2016
    Sorry Post Friendly . Friendly , Loyal, Civil, Solicitous , Sociable, Sympathetic, good, favorable, Amicable. OK it doesn't say anything about very slow providing what I bought . That comes under Eventually, Someday, Possible next year , I asked about finding FSK hardware when it was capable . I was given a answer. By the way FSK Capability was not in the original package .
  • edited August 2014
    Any time line for FSK RTTY  in a 6500?
    Andy K3UK
  • Chris DL5NAMChris DL5NAM Member
    edited December 2016
    >>> 2 years ago - Gerald - K5SDR, Official Rep <<<
    >>We have the hardware to do FSK but the software/FPGA coding is the pacing >>item. I don't have a date yet.

    Any time line for FSK RTTY  in a 6500?

  • KY6LA_HowardKY6LA_Howard La Jolla, CA. Paris and Sablet FranceMember ✭✭✭
    edited April 3
    Chris flex no longer will commit or comment on planned release dates for software. BTW. You only have 4 likes on this idea so clearly it is not that important to people
  • Chris DL5NAMChris DL5NAM Member
    edited December 2016
    Howard, i know and i know also b4 that no answer or comment from FRS will come. But FRS will get a reminder for an over 2 year old request for mode.
    But we must be very happy: we got FM :-)
  • KY6LA_HowardKY6LA_Howard La Jolla, CA. Paris and Sablet FranceMember ✭✭✭
    edited January 2017
    Keep on posting. To this topic. You may get more likes
  • WaltWalt Member ✭✭
    edited February 2019
    One more vote ( as before, at least I am consistent) for FSK RTTY ( and some matching Rx RTTY specific dual/peak filters) -  It is cleanest way to do RTTY, and would complete the 'total contest radio' concept.

    My hopes for the future of this radio series - I think it has the capacity to be the meanest contest machine in the hobby - which is why I bought my 6500. 

  • DH2IDDH2ID Member ✭✭
    edited February 2019
    You also have my vote for FSK RTTY and dual bandpass filters.
  • Simon LewisSimon Lewis Member
    edited July 2017
    yes please!
  • Bill N5TUBill N5TU Member ✭✭
    edited February 2019
    Please add FSK RTTY capability ... it is the most stable means of creating RTTY signals.  Many of us would be most grateful.  :-)

    Bill, N5TU

  • KY6LA_HowardKY6LA_Howard La Jolla, CA. Paris and Sablet FranceMember ✭✭✭
    edited December 2018
    We are up to 8 Likes

    Please hit the Like Button At the TOP OF THE PAGE if you want FSK
  • LarryLarry Member ✭✭
    edited July 2015
    10 now!

  • DH2IDDH2ID Member ✭✭
    edited December 2016
    13, c'mon let's treble that number ;-)
  • Bill-W9OLBill-W9OL Member
    edited January 2017
    One of the major reasons I bought the 6.5K was the potential for REAL FSK operation.
    Real FSK is much better in contests and when DXing.
    Please consider me 'in waiting'. And add me as a 'Like'.
  • Jim K4JAFJim K4JAF Member ✭✭
    edited January 2018
    Well it should be apparent that RTTY and all aspects of it such as FSK is certainly not high on Flex's list of priorities..  I still prefer to use my FT-5000 for rtty for a number of reasons..  FSK was promised in initial specifications of the 6000 series but that was soon forgotten.  As others have commented, how long must we RTTY users wait for basic operation aspects such as Mark frequency control instead of carrier frequency? 
  • KY6LA_HowardKY6LA_Howard La Jolla, CA. Paris and Sablet FranceMember ✭✭✭
    edited August 2015
    Click the like box at the top of this page
  • k0eook0eoo Member ✭✭
    edited March 2017
    Are we talking about adding a FSK/RTTY mode to SSDR so you can click on a spot and the radio will jump to the correct frequency & BP to  quickly work and log DX in a contest?  Like we can do now with CW and SSB?  If that's the case YES please LIKE this post up!!  I and others have been asking for this for over a year but couldn't get many interested in its importance.

    Dennis, k0eoo
  • k3Timk3Tim Member ✭✭
    edited May 23
    I asked before and did not receive a response so will try again...

    What is the advantage of FSK over "AFSK" on the 6k series?  

    In the old days of RTTY one used 88mH torroids and made a BPF for each of the M/S frequencies. If your rig didn't have FSK an audio generator was required make the two tones. Adjusting these devices (on the initial setup) was difficult at best.  Being at baseband audio for RTTY / AFSK was problematic to say the least with frequency drift and RFI being a concern.

    Nowadays with DAX, and by way of example, FLDIGI, the "AFSK" is pure digital and is never in the analog domain. On the 6K side, I would venture to say the signal stays digital.  Noise / RFI is hence not an issue.  Stability / accuracy is from clock domains that are ultimately derived from crystal oscillators.  With MRTTY (and perhaps FLDIGI?) one can filter (waveshape) the outgoing AFSK signal and have a cleaner / narrower transmit signal.  References are on the web which I can point to if need be.  AFSK / FSK should be same assuming the FSK signal is also be wave-shaped.

    The carrier offset "features" is mitigated by setting RCV and XMT offsets to -1500 Hz (FLDIGI sweet spot is 1500 cy). One will be transmitting/receiving at the center of the M/S tones and the slice frequency readout is centered between the two.

    On the receive side one can set the BW using one of the preset widths and have close to an optimal filter width (probably within 50 cycles).  The twin notch filtering available on some rigs for RTTY is interesting although not clear if this would help reception.  The 6K filters are very steep so interference above and below the channel is not a concern.  The frequency between M/S is filtered by the FLDIGI matched filter. Hence having a twin notch filter on a 6K would likely not bring that much to the party.  It would be informative to study the bit error rate versus Eb/No with and without such a twin-notching filter on a 6K.

    One important point made earlier was during a contest, a station parked on a frequency would end up following the responding calls if the AFC was turned on.  With FSK this was said to be a none issue.  To solve this one could use two slices, transmit with the frequency locked in slice A and receive on slice B, with the FLDIGI AGC being able to track the return callers frequency offset (on slice B).

    Stability / accuracy etc seems to be very much under control on AFSK versus FSK.
    AFSK via DAX should be viewed as baseband digital signal whereas FSK is digital @frequency.



  • Ken - NM9PKen - NM9P Member ✭✭
    edited June 23
    FSK or AFSK on Transmit may not be all that big a difference for the 6000 series, but if it is implemented well, the possibility of overdriving the transmitter with AFSK is eliminated.

    On Receive, however, and for general "interface" issues, I think there is a real possibility for improvement, including the following that have already been mentioned:
    1) RTTY frequencies centered in the receive filter automatically,
    2) CLick tune that doesn't need to be adjusted with RIT/XIT offsets,
    3) Implementation of dual peak RTTY filters,
    4) Accurate frequency display of mark and space tones,
    5) Accurate reporting of RTTY signals to spotting networks,
    6) Accurate frequency transition when clicking on spotted RTTY signals.
    7) Correct TX/RX frequency indication on panadapter when using XIT/RIT.

    Most of these functions have work-arounds now, by calculating RIT/XIT shifts, changing filter upper/lower frequencies, etc, but it takes a couple of minutes to make all the changes to get ready for RTTY operation.

    A dedicated RTTY mode that already does this would be a welcome addition.

    Ken - NM9P

  • k3Timk3Tim Member ✭✭
    edited December 2016
    Overdrive - a good point.  One would hope we are a better class of operators to let something like that occur in our stations.

    Items 1-3 and 5-9 are handled by XIT / RIT and a profile.
    Item #4 - Dual Peak = does it really help?  I am skeptical.

    (congrats on your LP ! )


Leave a Comment

Rich Text Editor. To edit a paragraph's style, hit tab to get to the paragraph menu. From there you will be able to pick one style. Nothing defaults to paragraph. An inline formatting menu will show up when you select text. Hit tab to get into that menu. Some elements, such as rich link embeds, images, loading indicators, and error messages may get inserted into the editor. You may navigate to these using the arrow keys inside of the editor and delete them with the delete or backspace key.