Welcome to the FlexRadio Community! Please review the new Community Rules and other important new Community information on the Message Board.
Need the latest SmartSDR or 4O3A Genius Product Software?
SmartSDR v3.9.19 and the SmartSDR v3.9.19 Release Notes
SmartSDR v2.12.1 and the SmartSDR v2.12.1 Release Notes
The latest 4O3A Genius Product Software and Firmware
SmartSDR v3.9.19 and the SmartSDR v3.9.19 Release Notes
SmartSDR v2.12.1 and the SmartSDR v2.12.1 Release Notes
The latest 4O3A Genius Product Software and Firmware
If you are having a problem, please refer to the product documentation or check the Help Center for known solutions.
Need technical support from FlexRadio? It's as simple as Creating a HelpDesk ticket.
Need technical support from FlexRadio? It's as simple as Creating a HelpDesk ticket.
MF performance with multiple antennas

K6OZY
Member ✭✭
I just picked up a PixelTech Mag Loop to hook up to SCU-B RX-In. I thought I'd post a quick BIG picture showing how much better it is at receiving MF than my Carolina Windom. It is doing an amazing job at being immune to all the noise I have to deal with. I cannot believe how many stations I can see now. I was able to receive HD AM from out of state! The top panadapter is the Carolina Windom, the bottom one is the MagLoop. I love how I can manipulate so many inputs on the radio. I never owned a 5000 that had multiple inputs, just a 1500 & 3000, so this configuration freedom is pretty amazing. I am looking forward to diversity reception abilities. I know this one is years out, but still. 


0
Comments
-
Chris: Thanks for posting this. FlexRadio uses the Pixel-Loop as a demonstration antenna at most Hamfests where we run live demos with the Flex-6000's. There is a lot of information in this comparison. It looks like the lower half of your MF (AM Broadcast) band is being jammed by some kind of power supply or video display noise. BUT, your Pixel-Loop is rejecting that noise by some 30 dB relative to your Windom. Of course your Windom is not tuned for MF, so it is acting like a big E-field (electric field) probe antenna. The Pixel-Loop is a pure H-field (magnetic field) antenna. I have always read that most man-made noise is worse in the E-field. That is certainly true in your case / environment at MF. Picking three random signals, your signal to noise improvement with the Pixel-Loop is anywhere from 5 to 21 dB with a typical improvement of 11 dB (about 2 S-units). On 790 kHz, were your slice is tuned, the signal to noise improvement is greater than 30 dB (5 S-units). That is dramatic. Pixel-Loop says their amplifier is set to reproduce the same signal level as a dipole, but I can't tell that, since your Windon is way off tune at MF. I also suspect that the improvement will not be quite as dramatic when the Windom is operated at resonance, and it is receiving both the E and H fields. Would you accept a "home-work" assignment to do the same dual display capture upon a frequency where the Windom is resonant? Thanks, --- Graham / KE9H ==0
-
Thanks for posting this Chris. I was on the "edge" on whether to spring for a Pixel-loop, this just put me over the top!!!!!0
Leave a Comment
Categories
- All Categories
- 338 Community Topics
- 2.1K New Ideas
- 607 The Flea Market
- 7.9K Software
- 6.3K SmartSDR for Windows
- 170 SmartSDR for Maestro and M models
- 401 SmartSDR for Mac
- 264 SmartSDR for iOS
- 247 SmartSDR CAT
- 185 DAX
- 371 SmartSDR API
- 9.1K Radios and Accessories
- 19 Aurora
- 190 FLEX-8000 Signature Series
- 7.1K FLEX-6000 Signature Series
- 913 Maestro
- 53 FlexControl
- 859 FLEX Series (Legacy) Radios
- 886 Genius Products
- 450 Power Genius XL Amplifier
- 320 Tuner Genius XL
- 116 Antenna Genius
- 281 Shack Infrastructure
- 197 Networking
- 442 Remote Operation (SmartLink)
- 137 Contesting
- 741 Peripherals & Station Integration
- 137 Amateur Radio Interests
- 954 Third-Party Software