Welcome to the FlexRadio Community! Please review the new Community Rules and other important new Community information on the Message Board.
Need the latest SmartSDR or 4O3A Genius Product Software?
SmartSDR v4.1.3 and the SmartSDR v4.1.3 Release Notes
SmartSDR v3.10.15 and the SmartSDR v3.10.15 Release Notes
The latest 4O3A Genius Product Software and Firmware
SmartSDR v4.1.3 and the SmartSDR v4.1.3 Release Notes
SmartSDR v3.10.15 and the SmartSDR v3.10.15 Release Notes
The latest 4O3A Genius Product Software and Firmware
If you are having a problem, please refer to the product documentation or check the Help Center for known solutions.
Need technical support from FlexRadio? It's as simple as Creating a HelpDesk ticket.
Need technical support from FlexRadio? It's as simple as Creating a HelpDesk ticket.
MF performance with multiple antennas
K6OZY
Member ✭✭✭
I just picked up a PixelTech Mag Loop to hook up to SCU-B RX-In. I thought I'd post a quick BIG picture showing how much better it is at receiving MF than my Carolina Windom. It is doing an amazing job at being immune to all the noise I have to deal with. I cannot believe how many stations I can see now. I was able to receive HD AM from out of state! The top panadapter is the Carolina Windom, the bottom one is the MagLoop. I love how I can manipulate so many inputs on the radio. I never owned a 5000 that had multiple inputs, just a 1500 & 3000, so this configuration freedom is pretty amazing. I am looking forward to diversity reception abilities. I know this one is years out, but still. 
0
Comments
-
Chris: Thanks for posting this. FlexRadio uses the Pixel-Loop as a demonstration antenna at most Hamfests where we run live demos with the Flex-6000's. There is a lot of information in this comparison. It looks like the lower half of your MF (AM Broadcast) band is being jammed by some kind of power supply or video display noise. BUT, your Pixel-Loop is rejecting that noise by some 30 dB relative to your Windom. Of course your Windom is not tuned for MF, so it is acting like a big E-field (electric field) probe antenna. The Pixel-Loop is a pure H-field (magnetic field) antenna. I have always read that most man-made noise is worse in the E-field. That is certainly true in your case / environment at MF. Picking three random signals, your signal to noise improvement with the Pixel-Loop is anywhere from 5 to 21 dB with a typical improvement of 11 dB (about 2 S-units). On 790 kHz, were your slice is tuned, the signal to noise improvement is greater than 30 dB (5 S-units). That is dramatic. Pixel-Loop says their amplifier is set to reproduce the same signal level as a dipole, but I can't tell that, since your Windon is way off tune at MF. I also suspect that the improvement will not be quite as dramatic when the Windom is operated at resonance, and it is receiving both the E and H fields. Would you accept a "home-work" assignment to do the same dual display capture upon a frequency where the Windom is resonant? Thanks, --- Graham / KE9H ==0
-
Thanks for posting this Chris. I was on the "edge" on whether to spring for a Pixel-loop, this just put me over the top!!!!!0
Leave a Comment
Categories
- All Categories
- 375 Community Topics
- 2.1K New Ideas
- 629 The Flea Market
- 8.2K Software
- 106 SmartSDR+
- 6.4K SmartSDR for Windows
- 183 SmartSDR for Maestro and M models
- 427 SmartSDR for Mac
- 271 SmartSDR for iOS
- 255 SmartSDR CAT
- 190 DAX
- 381 SmartSDR API
- 9.3K Radios and Accessories
- 36 Aurora
- 250 FLEX-8000 Signature Series
- 7.2K FLEX-6000 Signature Series
- 941 Maestro
- 55 FlexControl
- 864 FLEX Series (Legacy) Radios
- 917 Genius Products
- 460 Power Genius XL Amplifier
- 334 Tuner Genius XL
- 123 Antenna Genius
- 294 Shack Infrastructure
- 206 Networking
- 453 Remote Operation (SmartLink)
- 144 Contesting
- 784 Peripherals & Station Integration
- 139 Amateur Radio Interests
- 1K Third-Party Software