Welcome to the new FlexRadio Community! Please review the new Community Rules and other important new Community information on the Message Board.
If you are having a problem, please refer to the product documentation or check the Help Center for known solutions.
Need technical support from FlexRadio? It's as simple as Creating a HelpDesk ticket.

V2 & Improved Dynamic Range for FLEX-6300

Member ✭✭
edited November 2019 in SmartSDR for Windows
Any one know the details related to the IMD dynamic range performance improvement the 6300 gets in SmartSDR V2?

Welcome!

It looks like you're new here. Sign in or register to get started.

Answers

  • Member
    edited July 2017
    I'd like to know too...
  • Member ✭✭
    edited October 2018
    Mee too!
  • Administrator, FlexRadio Employee admin
    edited April 2019
    The details of what we did to improve the dynamic range w/o modifying the hardware is being treated as company IP (intellectual property), so we are not divulging the details.  Sorry.  I suspect our competitors would like to know how we did it also ;-)
  • Member ✭✭
    edited November 2019
    I think my question was misunderstood, not after how or what was done. As i didn't realize it was broke---:) Gerald, I'm trying to understand what this improved IMD will get me over what it was, sounds like it will give me better ears... Will what you did in v2 be included in the 1.11 maintenance release?
  • Administrator, FlexRadio Employee admin
    edited July 2017
    Yes, you will hear weak signals better with adjacent strong signals (improved IMD DR3) and the strong signal handling capabilities (overload level) have improved, minimizing distortion at high signal levels.  It got better all around.


  • Member ✭✭
    edited July 2017
    Thanks Tim, Gerald broke down what the "improved IMD" gets me over what i have today... will this fix be included in the 1.11 maintenance release?
  • Member ✭✭
    edited July 2017
    Improved IMD may get you nothing or it may get you everything, it just depends on how harsh the RF environment  in which you find yourself.  I think the improved ADC overload may be as important as the IMD number I think both are impressive.  I have a 6300 and was considering a 6400 upgrade but since I almost never use the radio I may just go with a V 2 upgrade on the 6300 

    73  W9OY
  • Member ✭✭✭
    edited July 2017
    What is intersting is why something has improved on my 6500. I saw Dave W2OX on air a few days ago and his IMD or transmition went way down through the noise floor. Now today I was on 40M and many said I looked the same,  something changed for the better.
  • Member ✭✭
    edited July 2017
    I'm inclined to wait for the fix to be ported to 1.11 maintenance release as i'm not after any of the new features in v2.
  • Member ✭✭✭
    edited July 2017
    Yes it will be in 1.11.
  • Member ✭✭
    edited July 2017
    Good to know. Well this improvement be noticeable while running nb and wnb?
  • Member ✭✭
    edited July 2017
    Does it apply to 6300 only? 
  • FlexRadio Employee ✭✭
    edited July 2017
    That applies to the 6300 only because of its lower sampling rate.
  • FlexRadio Employee ✭✭
    edited July 2017
    You probably would not notice a thing unless you had the lab equipment to measure it. It's the difference between your car being able to top at at 140 vs 150 mph.
  • Member ✭✭
    edited July 2017
    Thanks!

  • Member ✭✭
    edited July 2017
    Thanks Ria...
  • FlexRadio Employee ✭✭
    edited August 2017
    Bill, I believe you are observing the improved high pass filter cutoff on the digital transmitter filter passband.
  • Member ✭✭✭
    edited August 2017
    You *might* notice it in a contest weekend, on a crowded band with many strong signals. Or you may not. However being a contest op myself, I'd say that being able to use your radio is far more important than what it's capable of...

Leave a Comment