Welcome to the new FlexRadio Community! Please review the new Community Rules and other important new Community information on the Message Board.
If you are having a problem, please refer to the product documentation or check the Help Center for known solutions.
Need technical support from FlexRadio? It's as simple as Creating a HelpDesk ticket.

Noise Floor Change

Options
Bill Bailey
Bill Bailey Member ✭✭
edited November 2017 in SmartSDR for Windows
As I expand the horizontal frequency range on the bottom of the screen I have noticed that the baseline of the spectrum display (noise floor) gets lower. This happened on the last release also. Is this a problem? Bill Bailey AE6EQ

Answers

  • Sergey R5AU
    Sergey R5AU Member ✭✭
    edited April 2017
    Options
    Hi Bill, pls look at http://community.flexradio.com/flexradio/topics/band_gain_noise where explanations completed. I guess it is OK for you.
  • Al K0VM
    Al K0VM Member ✭✭✭
    edited November 2017
    Options
    Bill, That is normal for this radio.. There are a fixed number of bins ( narrow filters ) across the width of the spectrum display. As you change the span of the display the the bin size ( filter width ) changes. The narrower the filter the less noise in the filter and thus the lower the spectrum display noise level.. Note. Changing the spectrum display span dose not have any effect on the width of the receiver filter and thus the noise floor of the receiver. AL, K0VM
  • Bill Bailey
    Bill Bailey Member ✭✭
    edited September 2013
    Options
    Is there an implication that in order for the spectrum display noise floor display to accurately reflect the noise floor of the receiver then the bin size would have to be equal to the receiver filter width ? How do you know what the real noise floor is IF the spectrum display noise floor can move around based on bin size ? I do not recall seeing this behaviour on my 5000. Maybe I just never noticed it. B.B. AE6EQ
  • Al K0VM
    Al K0VM Member ✭✭✭
    edited November 2017
    Options
    In PowerSDR ( the FLex 5000 ) the panadapter binsize was fixed ( for a given sample rate ) and did not cahnge with the zoom. It did however change with the sample rate and so did the panadapter noise floor change with sample rate. PSDR had a maximum of 8:1 zoom factor and a 4:1 sample rate.. The FLex 6000 is a different beast.. The zoom factor is 1000:1 and there would likely be to much data to keep the same bin size through out the whole zoom range. You have likely noted that the receiver slice s-meter does not indicate a change in noise floor when zooming but it does indicate a change when changeing the receiver bandwidth. The panadapter noise floor and the receiver noise floor do share antenna noise and preamp noise figure but not much more. AL, K0VM
  • Rodney Thomson
    edited October 2013
    Options
    Hi Steve, The best approach when you have varying FFT bin sizes (for differing time/frequency resolution requirements) is to normalise the resulting power by the FFT size squared. In MATLAB it would be something like below (written verbosely): -------------------------------------- data_FFT = fft(raw_rf_time_series, fft_size); power = real(data_FFT)*real(data_FFT) + imag(data_FFT)*imag(data_FFT) power = power ./ (fft_size*fft_size) -------------------------------------- The end result if you then take the log scale of the data is you have power in units of dB re 1 count / Hz. So as your FFT size decreases (and bandwidth increases) the power should remain similar. And if you are aware of the transfer functions within the radio you can convert to real units (ie dBm/Hz). And you could also extrapolate a 500Hz 'noise floor' measurement at all resolutions to then remain consistent with ham convention. (Note I am not a ham person, but have a lot of acoustic visualisation experience and a need for an SDR!) Rod
  • Steve-N5AC
    Steve-N5AC Community Manager admin
    edited July 2017
    Options
    This is a great idea to show a relative power FFT. But, we are actually showing an absolute power FFT where we read the output power in dBm at the antenna connector. Also, we scale the FFT by your window size on the client anyway, so this scaling would get thrown away in that process.
  • John Dalrymple
    edited March 2015
    Options
    I agree with Rod that you should provide the ability to normalize as he suggests above, so you display dBm based on "absolute watts per Hz bandwidth" at all bin sizes. Otherwise you end up with situations like the attached images show. Which "noise floor display" is correct? Your answer: both of them.

    When I first saw this, I thought it was a bug. Now ater browsing this board, I find you're saying it's a feature, however, it's a confusing feature and since you don't tell us the bin size of each display, we can't compute the watts/Hz even if we wanted to.
    image.

    image

    John K7JCD

  • Steve-N5AC
    Steve-N5AC Community Manager admin
    edited December 2016
    Options
    Couple of things here -- the panadapter shows three main things: 1) signals, 2) Johnson noise from the receiver, 3) atmospheric noise.  In any given bin, only one of these things is visible because we measure the absolute level of the bin and this is the magnitude of the strongest of these three.  We also have no idea which of the three we are showing, generally.  If a signal is visible, you can read the power of the signal directly off of the panadapter and it is accurate within a couple of dB.  If there is noise, you can't really tell by looking and I can't tell you if you are looking at Johnson noise from the circuit or atmospheric noise.  So I can tell you the absolute power of any signals you see and I can tell you the level of the combined atmospheric and Johnson noise.

    I could normalize the panadapter to the RBW of the bins.  If I did this, the noise floor would remain a constant level and you could always read the noise floor level in something like dBm/Hz, W/Hz or the more common nV/rootHz.  How would these numbers benefit you (I bet only one in a thousand of our customers really understand what a nV/rootHz measurement conveys)?  Even worse, if I normalize, now you can no longer read the signal strength of real signals -- they will vary based on the bin width.  For example a S9 signal is -73dBm.  But if we convert this into dBm/Hz and my bins are 10Hz, it will read as -83dBm/Hz.  Zoom out to 100Hz bins and it will read -93dBm/Hz.  How does this help?

    Every spectrum analyzer I have used shows power just like we do.  Most people are interested in either the signal strength or the SNR and not the level of the noise -- the noise simply prevents a reading if it is above the signal level.  Have I missed something in your comment?  

    I also would not convey what we are doing as a "feature."  We are simply showing the true value of the noise or signal in the bin.  To me, scaling the panadapter by the bin width to yield dBm/Hz or similar is like changing all of the gas pumps in the US to read in "dollars per liter."  Yes the information would still be factual and accurate, but few would understand what it means nor embrace the change.
  • Simon Lewis
    Simon Lewis Member ✭✭
    edited April 2015
    Options
    learnt a lot from that - much appreciated :) - I noticed this curve on a few videos .. is there not a simpler cause?? resonance of the antenna for example? or we talking the small peaks and spikes in the noise baseline only .. keen to understand what we are looking at here :)
  • Steve-N5AC
    Steve-N5AC Community Manager admin
    edited December 2016
    Options
    Well, there are two things being discussed now.  If you look at the top panadapter and compare to the bottom, John is showing that they both show two different noise levels.  We display power in a given bandwidth so the noise floor moves as the resolution bandwidth (RBW) is changed.  This is what I cover above.  

    But the **** in the top panadapter just indicates that there is more noise in some of those bins than others.  Generally when I see this it is as you say, the resonance of the antenna.  The antenna is resonant in this range and so it pull in more signals and noise and so the total power in that bin is higher than in adjacent bins where the antenna is not resonant.  It could also represent just more power in those bins -- for example there might be several strong signals that add together to raise the bin, but generally a nice shape like this is really the antenna.
  • DH2ID
    DH2ID Member ✭✭✭
    edited December 2016
    Options
    Steve, I like your explanation about noise floor levels.
    I'll take it to our club meeting this friday and explain it
    in German ;-) That'll show some of these OKL (Old Knob Lovers)
    73, Alex DH2ID

Leave a Comment

Rich Text Editor. To edit a paragraph's style, hit tab to get to the paragraph menu. From there you will be able to pick one style. Nothing defaults to paragraph. An inline formatting menu will show up when you select text. Hit tab to get into that menu. Some elements, such as rich link embeds, images, loading indicators, and error messages may get inserted into the editor. You may navigate to these using the arrow keys inside of the editor and delete them with the delete or backspace key.