ARRL QST Review of the Flex-6400M is up now

  • 2
  • Praise
  • Updated 3 weeks ago
If you are a member of the ARRL you can look at their review of the Flex-6400M from the February 2019 QST at http://www.arrl.org/reviews-listed-by-issue

Zack
N8FNR
Photo of Zack Schindler - N8FNR

Zack Schindler - N8FNR

  • 88 Posts
  • 15 Reply Likes

Posted 2 months ago

  • 2
Photo of K6OZY

K6OZY, Elmer

  • 539 Posts
  • 200 Reply Likes
Photo of Matt - KD5FGE

Matt - KD5FGE, Employee

  • 125 Posts
  • 63 Reply Likes
The video is now on Youtube: https://youtu.be/VKOYSQx-ESE
Photo of Burt Fisher

Burt Fisher

  • 1138 Posts
  • 412 Reply Likes
The video says, "two receivers" but I believe it is two slices of the SAME receiver? 
Photo of K6OZY

K6OZY, Elmer

  • 539 Posts
  • 200 Reply Likes
Not exactly.   It is two "receivers" meaning these two slice "receivers" can go anywhere along the HF band.  They are bound to the same SCU, thus linked to the SAME antenna.
Photo of K6OZY

K6OZY, Elmer

  • 539 Posts
  • 200 Reply Likes
I ripped it from YT and put it on my server for offline download pleasure.

http://www.ozy.us/stuff/February%20QST%20Product%20Review.mp4
Photo of Bill -VA3WTB

Bill -VA3WTB

  • 3178 Posts
  • 706 Reply Likes
It is nice he shows how the radio works, but I don't consider this a review. Sadly there isn't anyone in ham radio that does real reviews.
Photo of Burt Fisher

Burt Fisher

  • 1138 Posts
  • 412 Reply Likes
Some reviews in QST are adjacent ad for the reviewed product. Conflict of interest?
Photo of Neil D Friedman N3DF

Neil D Friedman N3DF

  • 129 Posts
  • 30 Reply Likes
I have not gone through back issues, but in the February 2019 issue the closest ad of any sort to the product review section is 18 pages away.  
Photo of Burt Fisher

Burt Fisher

  • 1138 Posts
  • 412 Reply Likes
About 9 months ago there was a review where the  ad was right on the following page. It was a major item too. They rarely say anything critical if it is an advertiser.