Welcome to the new FlexRadio Community! Please review the new Community Rules and other important new Community information on the Message Board.
If you are having a problem, please check the Help Center for known solutions.
Need technical support from FlexRadio? It's as simple as Creating a HelpDesk ticket.
Need technical support from FlexRadio? It's as simple as Creating a HelpDesk ticket.
Need the latest SmartSDR and Power Genius Software?
SmartSDR v3.1.12 and the SmartSDR v3.1.12 Release Notes. | SmartSDR v2.6.2 and the SmartSDR v2.6.2 Release Notes.
SmartSDR v1.12.1 and the SmartSDR v1.12.1 Release Notes. | Power Genius XL Firmware v3.4.16. | Power Genius XL Utility v2.2.10.
SmartSDR v3.1.12 and the SmartSDR v3.1.12 Release Notes. | SmartSDR v2.6.2 and the SmartSDR v2.6.2 Release Notes.
SmartSDR v1.12.1 and the SmartSDR v1.12.1 Release Notes. | Power Genius XL Firmware v3.4.16. | Power Genius XL Utility v2.2.10.
Diversity Reception Filtering with 6600

Has anyone looked at "OR'ing" the outputs of diversity reception so that only a signal that is common from both receivers is passed?
Anyone know any programs that can take DAX IQ streams and perform these operations? I believe some of the open Source SDR products have modular signal processing capabilities.
Anyone know any programs that can take DAX IQ streams and perform these operations? I believe some of the open Source SDR products have modular signal processing capabilities.
0
Leave a Comment
Categories
- 69 Community Topics
- 1.9K New Ideas
- 119 The Flea Market
- 5.4K Software
- 4.9K SmartSDR for Windows
- 35 SmartSDR for Maestro and M models
- 85 SmartSDR for Mac
- 143 SmartSDR for iOS
- 149 SmartSDR CAT
- 66 DAX
- 278 SmartSDR API
- 7.1K Radios and Accessories
- 5.8K FLEX-6000 Signature Series
- 553 Maestro
- 14 FlexControl
- 723 FLEX Series (Legacy) Radios
- 149 Power Genius Products
- 117 Power Genius XL Amplifier
- 10 Power Genius Utility
- 22 Tuner Genius
- 41 Shack Infrastructure
- 22 Networking
- 89 Remote Operation (SmartLink)
- 50 Contesting
- 127 Peripherals & Station Integration
- 61 Amateur Radio Interests
- 404 Third-Party Software
Answers
Steve, is it possible to report on the 5 year mission to incorporate 5000 level diversity plus extensions into the 6000 series?
Stan
Only the current 6000 implementation uses between the ears diversity by putting the two phase synchronized audio signals on left and right.
The 5000 implementation permits the user to merge the two antenna streams with level and phase adjustments, as Dwayne was saying to AND the two streams.
I have a 6700 and a IC-7850 with 2 receiver inputs. I also have two Pixel magnetic loop antennas. The Rx antennas are about 100 feet apart and physically phased 90 degrees apart. My "mixer" is in my head.
RE the “5-year mission” (-: some discussions from several years ago on the current “poor man’s” diversity reception and possible follow-on DSP-enhanced “optimal combining” diversity:
https://community.flexradio.com/flexradio/topics/-optimal-combining-diversity
FWIW, Rx “beam steering” via phase/amplitude adjustments is readily available in outboard units, like the MFJ-1026 and DXE NCC1/2. These can be highly effective in nulling out locally generated noise and signals under certain conditions.
Howard
It might be OK for SSB, CW and even RTTY for guru. However, I cannot decode hundreds of FT8 signals simultaneously with my tiny brain and I really want to ask Flex to implement diversity reception capability, not using an organic mean, for digital modes in an early manner to differentiate it from competitors.
de JA2IYJ, JI1BNU
Ken Yamada
N8AUM Vidas
Years ago I experimented with diversity reception on RTTY. I had two receivers and two separate antennas. The audio outputs were combined into a single input to old style TU. It worked surprisingly well. There was a QST article back in the 60s or 70s that inspired me to try this. It would be nice if a way could be provided to digitally sum two or more DAX audio streams prior to being sent to the decoding program.
73, Mark K5XH
A signal voter works even better because it eliminates the noise of the lesser channel. It measures the S/N and votes the better for further processing. The mind can do amazing things to differentiate unwanted signals from desirable ones that it was programmed for but has difficulty decoding RTTY, PSK31, FT4 etc.
I have several JPS SNV-4 signal voters that do well on voice signals on my 6700's but were not designed for narrow digital sigs. It would be good if Flex could tackle this.
Bill AB7AA
Question was raised about the 5000 true diversity.
That is, one of a stack of reasons, why I purchased the 6700 on first availability. It worked very well then on the 5000 dual receiver and has only been improved. I am still waiting to see how much better the 6700's dual SCA receive path could be, and now the 6600 is waiting for the feature as well. Between the ears diversity works some, but is truly missing what the 5000 has and 6600/6700 could be.
I've had the hardware for 6 years+ and still waiting for the software. Hint: It could be a very significant military feature - Worth paying the research bill for.
Would a voter be able to keep up with a RTTY signal? Sounds like a good idea if it would work fast enough to pick the stronger M/S tone. Here is a link to the QST article I remembered seeing. Check out the difference between single channel reception and diversity. If this kind of improvement is possible using a bunch of transformers, diodes, and vacuum tubes it should be easy with modern software. After all, it's just a SMOP - Simple Matter of Programming!! If it were really simple I could probably do it :-)
https://www.robkalmeijer.nl/techniek/electronica/radiotechniek/hambladen/qst/1966/04/page40/index.html
73, Mark K5XH
I was told when I bought the 6600 that they have no plans in putting in beam steering. I use an mfj 1026 it works great. and there is no chance in heck you brain can pull s9 noise from a power line out with diversity mode because unless you phase it out you're not hearing a thing on either ear but solid noise