Welcome to the FlexRadio Community! Please review the new Community Rules and other important new Community information on the Message Board.
Need the latest SmartSDR or 4O3A Genius Product Software?
SmartSDR v4.1.3 and the SmartSDR v4.1.3 Release Notes
SmartSDR v3.10.15 and the SmartSDR v3.10.15 Release Notes
The latest 4O3A Genius Product Software and Firmware
SmartSDR v4.1.3 and the SmartSDR v4.1.3 Release Notes
SmartSDR v3.10.15 and the SmartSDR v3.10.15 Release Notes
The latest 4O3A Genius Product Software and Firmware
If you are having a problem, please refer to the product documentation or check the Help Center for known solutions.
Need technical support from FlexRadio? It's as simple as Creating a HelpDesk ticket.
Need technical support from FlexRadio? It's as simple as Creating a HelpDesk ticket.
FLEX 6600M Receiver Test Data
Валерий Смирнов
Member
WHY FlexRadio posted thith --https://www.flexradio.com/flex-6600/
>155 dB Dynamic Range
115 dB 2kHz RMDR
BUT i see
http://www.sherweng.com/table
Dynamic Range = 99 dB
>155 dB Dynamic Range
115 dB 2kHz RMDR
BUT i see
http://www.sherweng.com/table
Dynamic Range = 99 dB
0
Answers
-
To much testing not enough using.
2 -
Craig :-) While I may agree with your statement (yes, it IS an amazing radio), it does not provide
an answer to the original poster.
It is a fair question he asks; why Flex's data and Sherwood's data do not agree, and the likely
answer is testing methodology differences. But until (and if) Flex employees answer, you and me
do not know the answer he is looking for, and we are only speculating.
Cheers. (no harm intended)
Neal3 -
I suspect the >155 db number is referring to blocking dynamic range which would be about right compared to the Flex RMDR claim. The 115 db 2khz RMDR number is 16 db better than Sherwood's test. I've read that there can be a pretty wide variation in this number between ADC chips that are used in the radio. This might answer that question ? Maybe Gerald can weigh in on this ?0 -
Why presume Sherwood has it right? Complete nonsense to treat any single guy as the benchmark setting standard. This has been covered before in the community and Gerald has spoken to it before on the community. Personally I’m less interested in arguing which lab does it technically correct and is less free of economic bias knowing that some of these independent labs have asked to be compensated. They all have skin in the game somehow. More interested in certification labs who professionalism requires best practices. 73 Steve K9ZW1
Leave a Comment
Categories
- All Categories
- 371 Community Topics
- 2.1K New Ideas
- 629 The Flea Market
- 8.2K Software
- 93 SmartSDR+
- 6.4K SmartSDR for Windows
- 182 SmartSDR for Maestro and M models
- 424 SmartSDR for Mac
- 270 SmartSDR for iOS
- 255 SmartSDR CAT
- 190 DAX
- 381 SmartSDR API
- 9.3K Radios and Accessories
- 35 Aurora
- 246 FLEX-8000 Signature Series
- 7.2K FLEX-6000 Signature Series
- 937 Maestro
- 54 FlexControl
- 863 FLEX Series (Legacy) Radios
- 917 Genius Products
- 460 Power Genius XL Amplifier
- 334 Tuner Genius XL
- 123 Antenna Genius
- 294 Shack Infrastructure
- 206 Networking
- 451 Remote Operation (SmartLink)
- 144 Contesting
- 782 Peripherals & Station Integration
- 139 Amateur Radio Interests
- 996 Third-Party Software


