Welcome to the FlexRadio Community! Please review the new Community Rules and other important new Community information on the Message Board.
The latest SmartSDR Software:
SmartSDR v4.1.5 | SmartSDR v4.1.5 Release Notes
SmartSDR v3.10.15 | SmartSDR v3.10.15 Release Notes
The latest 4O3A Genius Product Software:
The latest 4O3A Genius Product Software and Firmware
SmartSDR v4.1.5 | SmartSDR v4.1.5 Release Notes
SmartSDR v3.10.15 | SmartSDR v3.10.15 Release Notes
The latest 4O3A Genius Product Software:
The latest 4O3A Genius Product Software and Firmware
How to Receive Technical Support::
If you are needing assistance with FlexRadio products, please refer to the product documentation or check the Help Center for known solutions. Need technical support from FlexRadio? It's as simple as creating a HelpDesk ticket.
If you are needing assistance with FlexRadio products, please refer to the product documentation or check the Help Center for known solutions. Need technical support from FlexRadio? It's as simple as creating a HelpDesk ticket.
The BatBeam Project
Comments
-
Make the antenna change its shape between RX and TX. Max pattern for RX max gain for TX. This therefore would not be a freq agile antenna but a pattern agile antenna
73 W9OY0 -
Interesting idea, Lee. Can you elaborate with an example of what shape change would provide hugher RX gain that TX?0
-
The incidence of highest forward gain generally does not coincide with the incidence of best receiving pattern with deep F/B and F/S. So by changing element length dynamically with TX v RX, you can design in more gain on TX which is desirable and best pattern on RX which is desireable. On RX gain is not most relevant since it is signal to noise that dominates, and the whole point of a beam on RX is to eliminate unwanted noise. On RX you basically always have more gain in the signal chain than you can use. So changing the shape of the antenna on TX v RX maximizes each goal within a single antenna. This idea is no different than using a 4 square on transmit (max directional gain) but using a beverage (max directional signal to noise) on receive on say 160M.
73 W9OY0 -
Unfortunately, after much experimentation with using micro controllers and relays to switch resonant antenna sections as an alternative to varying the conductor lengths, the amount of RF present is too much for the microcontrollers to handle. The initial BatBeam prototype was a failure.
It was a fun project and R&D. Heck, that’s the point of ham radio isn’t it?1
Leave a Comment
Categories
- All Categories
- 389 Community Topics
- 2.2K New Ideas
- 658 The Flea Market
- 8.4K Software
- 157 SmartSDR+
- 6.5K SmartSDR for Windows
- 186 SmartSDR for Maestro and M models
- 439 SmartSDR for Mac
- 275 SmartSDR for iOS
- 265 SmartSDR CAT
- 204 DAX
- 386 SmartSDR API
- 9.4K Radios and Accessories
- 53 Aurora
- 297 FLEX-8000 Signature Series
- 7.2K FLEX-6000 Signature Series
- 970 Maestro
- 58 FlexControl
- 866 FLEX Series (Legacy) Radios
- 944 Genius Products
- 471 Power Genius XL Amplifier
- 347 Tuner Genius XL
- 126 Antenna Genius
- 307 Shack Infrastructure
- 215 Networking
- 468 Remote Operation (SmartLink)
- 142 Contesting
- 811 Peripherals & Station Integration
- 144 Amateur Radio Interests
- 1.1K Third-Party Software