Welcome to the new FlexRadio Community! Please review the new Community Rules and other important new Community information on the Message Board.
If you are having a problem, please check the Help Center for known solutions.
Need technical support from FlexRadio? It's as simple as Creating a HelpDesk ticket.
Need technical support from FlexRadio? It's as simple as Creating a HelpDesk ticket.
Need the latest SmartSDR and Power Genius Software?
SmartSDR v3.1.12 and the SmartSDR v3.1.12 Release Notes. | SmartSDR v2.6.2 and the SmartSDR v2.6.2 Release Notes.
SmartSDR v1.12.1 and the SmartSDR v1.12.1 Release Notes. | Power Genius XL Firmware v3.4.16. | Power Genius XL Utility v2.2.10.
SmartSDR v3.1.12 and the SmartSDR v3.1.12 Release Notes. | SmartSDR v2.6.2 and the SmartSDR v2.6.2 Release Notes.
SmartSDR v1.12.1 and the SmartSDR v1.12.1 Release Notes. | Power Genius XL Firmware v3.4.16. | Power Genius XL Utility v2.2.10.
JT-65 decoding discrepancies
Every time a new version comes out I set up the old and new version to see if the new is an improvement in decoding. Since I have the 6500, four sessions are possible running on separate slices. I have determined that if I setup four slices [on the same frequency] and four JT-65 sessions [same version] there are differences in the decoded calls about 25% of the time. The missed calls are usually the weaker ones in the -20db range. However, have decoded signals in the -27 db strength now and then. Has anyone else tried this experiment.?
0
Leave a Comment
Categories
- 69 Community Topics
- 1.9K New Ideas
- 120 The Flea Market
- 5.4K Software
- 4.9K SmartSDR for Windows
- 35 SmartSDR for Maestro and M models
- 86 SmartSDR for Mac
- 143 SmartSDR for iOS
- 149 SmartSDR CAT
- 67 DAX
- 278 SmartSDR API
- 7.1K Radios and Accessories
- 5.8K FLEX-6000 Signature Series
- 555 Maestro
- 14 FlexControl
- 722 FLEX Series (Legacy) Radios
- 149 Power Genius Products
- 117 Power Genius XL Amplifier
- 10 Power Genius Utility
- 22 Tuner Genius
- 41 Shack Infrastructure
- 22 Networking
- 89 Remote Operation (SmartLink)
- 50 Contesting
- 127 Peripherals & Station Integration
- 62 Amateur Radio Interests
- 404 Third-Party Software
Comments
So what versions of what are you comparing ? I like JT65 an have an interest in what you are seeing.
Cheers
Cheers
Greetings & 73's from sunny Maldives
George
YV5WZ / 8Q
I have been watching two slices on 20 meters and they pretty much track. 60 percent are the same signal levels, the others are within 1 db of each other, the 1 db advantage is not on slice A or B, but they both take turns being the 1 up. Because of noise levels in the city, I cannot copy anything below -20db.
Not much help, it seems, but I do not see any real dif. between two slices. And with my small screen I have no room for more than that.
Maybe someone else will find a difference that can be traced to a particular issue.
good luck and cheers
... but if you *can* achieve identical slices, then something is probably awry in their separate audio streams -- likely dropped samples in one of them.
Cal/N3CAL
I use a Windows batch file to start up both instances, one for 20m (Slice A, COM4, DAX1) and other for 17m (Slice B, COM5, DAX2):
cd "C:Program Files (x86)wsjtxin"
@start wsjtx --rig-name=20m
@start wsjtx --rig-name=17m
cmd /K
I can get successful simultaneous JT9&JT65 decodes on each slice but would like to assign CAT control of each instance WSJT-X to its respective panadapter independently. This should allow independent frequency settings for each instance of WSJT-X
I was curious if anyone is struggling with this issue and any work-arounds found. Ideally, it would be advantageous to have selectable COM ports per panadapter and/or slice.
73,
Rob - AG6RK
AL, K0VM