Welcome to the FlexRadio Community! Please review the new Community Rules and other important new Community information on the Message Board.
Need the latest SmartSDR or 4O3A Genius Product Software?
SmartSDR v4.1.5 | SmartSDR v4.1.5 Release Notes
SmartSDR v3.10.15 | SmartSDR v3.10.15 Release Notes
The latest 4O3A Genius Product Software and Firmware
SmartSDR v4.1.5 | SmartSDR v4.1.5 Release Notes
SmartSDR v3.10.15 | SmartSDR v3.10.15 Release Notes
The latest 4O3A Genius Product Software and Firmware
If you are having a problem, please refer to the product documentation or check the Help Center for known solutions.
Need technical support from FlexRadio? It's as simple as Creating a HelpDesk ticket.
Need technical support from FlexRadio? It's as simple as Creating a HelpDesk ticket.
New averaging method doesn't feel like an improvement...
Michael - N5TGL
Member ✭✭
Well, with the change to fast attack and slow delay, it seems we've managed to "un-average" the averaging function.
What you guys had before (1.0.24) looked really great, and this change (US2102) feels like a step backwards to the old spastic display.
Now I realize that you can't please all the people all the time, but having a switch selection for the old method vs. the new sure would be appreciated. With the last version, I was able to set averaging to right around 11 and it worked great...with 1.1, I have it run up to 95 and it still doesn't look quite right to me.
Can we please consider a switch selectable averaging method in the next release? Or a way to adjust attack/decay to our liking? I sure liked 1.0.24's method and appearance better.
Now I realize that you can't please all the people all the time, but having a switch selection for the old method vs. the new sure would be appreciated. With the last version, I was able to set averaging to right around 11 and it worked great...with 1.1, I have it run up to 95 and it still doesn't look quite right to me.
Can we please consider a switch selectable averaging method in the next release? Or a way to adjust attack/decay to our liking? I sure liked 1.0.24's method and appearance better.
1
Comments
-
Try increasing the averaging time a little bit.
1 -
I've got the "avg" at 95, so there's not much room to increase.
Unless I am missing another setting somewhere? I've got FPS set at 25, which has been a pretty fluid setting so far. 0 -
I concur with Michael. Sweet 1.1 upgrade, but a "miss" on the averaging display.
0 -
The new display averaging is a big improvement in that peak levels are shown instead of being averaged down where signal strength accuracy is lost. It makes no sense to average and "dumb down" the peak signal strength. I'm running FPS at 30, and AVG at 74. Perhaps a bit more room up the scale to add a bit more decay time may help some users.
Paul, W9AC
1 -
New method is not bad, my sets- avg=65, fps=20. For the thirst time i was surprised but i guess it can be more suitable for further under curve paintbrushing.0
Leave a Comment
Categories
- All Categories
- 383 Community Topics
- 2.1K New Ideas
- 640 The Flea Market
- 8.3K Software
- 147 SmartSDR+
- 6.4K SmartSDR for Windows
- 188 SmartSDR for Maestro and M models
- 435 SmartSDR for Mac
- 274 SmartSDR for iOS
- 262 SmartSDR CAT
- 201 DAX
- 383 SmartSDR API
- 9.4K Radios and Accessories
- 47 Aurora
- 279 FLEX-8000 Signature Series
- 7.2K FLEX-6000 Signature Series
- 958 Maestro
- 58 FlexControl
- 866 FLEX Series (Legacy) Radios
- 934 Genius Products
- 466 Power Genius XL Amplifier
- 342 Tuner Genius XL
- 126 Antenna Genius
- 304 Shack Infrastructure
- 213 Networking
- 464 Remote Operation (SmartLink)
- 144 Contesting
- 796 Peripherals & Station Integration
- 142 Amateur Radio Interests
- 1K Third-Party Software


