Welcome to the new FlexRadio Community! Please review the new Community Rules and other important new Community information on the Message Board.
If you are having a problem, please check the Help Center for known solutions.
Need technical support from FlexRadio? It's as simple as Creating a HelpDesk ticket.
Need technical support from FlexRadio? It's as simple as Creating a HelpDesk ticket.
Need the latest SmartSDR and Power Genius Software?
SmartSDR v3.2.31 and the SmartSDR v3.2.31 Release Notes. | SmartSDR v2.6.2 and the SmartSDR v2.6.2 Release Notes.
SmartSDR v1.12.1 and the SmartSDR v1.12.1 Release Notes. | Power Genius XL Firmware v3.5.23. | Power Genius XL Utility v2.2.10.
SmartSDR v3.2.31 and the SmartSDR v3.2.31 Release Notes. | SmartSDR v2.6.2 and the SmartSDR v2.6.2 Release Notes.
SmartSDR v1.12.1 and the SmartSDR v1.12.1 Release Notes. | Power Genius XL Firmware v3.5.23. | Power Genius XL Utility v2.2.10.
New averaging method doesn't feel like an improvement...
Michael - N5TGL
Member ✭✭
Well, with the change to fast attack and slow delay, it seems we've managed to "un-average" the averaging function.
What you guys had before (1.0.24) looked really great, and this change (US2102) feels like a step backwards to the old spastic display.
Now I realize that you can't please all the people all the time, but having a switch selection for the old method vs. the new sure would be appreciated. With the last version, I was able to set averaging to right around 11 and it worked great...with 1.1, I have it run up to 95 and it still doesn't look quite right to me.
Can we please consider a switch selectable averaging method in the next release? Or a way to adjust attack/decay to our liking? I sure liked 1.0.24's method and appearance better.

Now I realize that you can't please all the people all the time, but having a switch selection for the old method vs. the new sure would be appreciated. With the last version, I was able to set averaging to right around 11 and it worked great...with 1.1, I have it run up to 95 and it still doesn't look quite right to me.
Can we please consider a switch selectable averaging method in the next release? Or a way to adjust attack/decay to our liking? I sure liked 1.0.24's method and appearance better.
1
Comments
-
Try increasing the averaging time a little bit.
1 -
I've got the "avg" at 95, so there's not much room to increase.
Unless I am missing another setting somewhere? I've got FPS set at 25, which has been a pretty fluid setting so far.
0 -
I concur with Michael. Sweet 1.1 upgrade, but a "miss" on the averaging display.
0 -
The new display averaging is a big improvement in that peak levels are shown instead of being averaged down where signal strength accuracy is lost. It makes no sense to average and "dumb down" the peak signal strength. I'm running FPS at 30, and AVG at 74. Perhaps a bit more room up the scale to add a bit more decay time may help some users.
Paul, W9AC
1 -
New method is not bad, my sets- avg=65, fps=20. For the thirst time i was surprised but i guess it can be more suitable for further under curve paintbrushing.0
Leave a Comment
Howdy, Stranger!
Categories
- 16.2K All Categories
- 75 Community Topics
- 1.9K New Ideas
- 154 The Flea Market
- 5.5K Software
- 5K SmartSDR for Windows
- 47 SmartSDR for Maestro and M models
- 111 SmartSDR for Mac
- 151 SmartSDR for iOS
- 152 SmartSDR CAT
- 75 DAX
- 280 SmartSDR API
- 7.2K Radios and Accessories
- 5.9K FLEX-6000 Signature Series
- 575 Maestro
- 15 FlexControl
- 739 FLEX Series (Legacy) Radios
- 183 Power Genius Products
- 138 Power Genius XL Amplifier
- 15 Power Genius Utility
- 30 Tuner Genius
- 49 Shack Infrastructure
- 27 Networking
- 107 Remote Operation (SmartLink)
- 54 Contesting
- 160 Peripherals & Station Integration
- 64 Amateur Radio Interests
- 441 Third-Party Software