Welcome to the FlexRadio Community! Please review the new Community Rules and other important new Community information on the Message Board.
Need the latest SmartSDR or 4O3A Genius Product Software?
SmartSDR v3.9.19 and the SmartSDR v3.9.19 Release Notes
SmartSDR v2.12.1 and the SmartSDR v2.12.1 Release Notes
The latest 4O3A Genius Product Software and Firmware
SmartSDR v3.9.19 and the SmartSDR v3.9.19 Release Notes
SmartSDR v2.12.1 and the SmartSDR v2.12.1 Release Notes
The latest 4O3A Genius Product Software and Firmware
If you are having a problem, please refer to the product documentation or check the Help Center for known solutions.
Need technical support from FlexRadio? It's as simple as Creating a HelpDesk ticket.
Need technical support from FlexRadio? It's as simple as Creating a HelpDesk ticket.
New averaging method doesn't feel like an improvement...
Michael - N5TGL
Member ✭✭
Well, with the change to fast attack and slow delay, it seems we've managed to "un-average" the averaging function.
What you guys had before (1.0.24) looked really great, and this change (US2102) feels like a step backwards to the old spastic display.
Now I realize that you can't please all the people all the time, but having a switch selection for the old method vs. the new sure would be appreciated. With the last version, I was able to set averaging to right around 11 and it worked great...with 1.1, I have it run up to 95 and it still doesn't look quite right to me.
Can we please consider a switch selectable averaging method in the next release? Or a way to adjust attack/decay to our liking? I sure liked 1.0.24's method and appearance better.

Now I realize that you can't please all the people all the time, but having a switch selection for the old method vs. the new sure would be appreciated. With the last version, I was able to set averaging to right around 11 and it worked great...with 1.1, I have it run up to 95 and it still doesn't look quite right to me.
Can we please consider a switch selectable averaging method in the next release? Or a way to adjust attack/decay to our liking? I sure liked 1.0.24's method and appearance better.
1
Comments
-
Try increasing the averaging time a little bit.
1 -
I've got the "avg" at 95, so there's not much room to increase.
Unless I am missing another setting somewhere? I've got FPS set at 25, which has been a pretty fluid setting so far.
0 -
I concur with Michael. Sweet 1.1 upgrade, but a "miss" on the averaging display.
0 -
The new display averaging is a big improvement in that peak levels are shown instead of being averaged down where signal strength accuracy is lost. It makes no sense to average and "dumb down" the peak signal strength. I'm running FPS at 30, and AVG at 74. Perhaps a bit more room up the scale to add a bit more decay time may help some users.
Paul, W9AC
1 -
New method is not bad, my sets- avg=65, fps=20. For the thirst time i was surprised but i guess it can be more suitable for further under curve paintbrushing.0
Leave a Comment
Categories
- All Categories
- 338 Community Topics
- 2.1K New Ideas
- 607 The Flea Market
- 7.9K Software
- 6.3K SmartSDR for Windows
- 170 SmartSDR for Maestro and M models
- 401 SmartSDR for Mac
- 264 SmartSDR for iOS
- 247 SmartSDR CAT
- 185 DAX
- 371 SmartSDR API
- 9.1K Radios and Accessories
- 19 Aurora
- 190 FLEX-8000 Signature Series
- 7.1K FLEX-6000 Signature Series
- 913 Maestro
- 53 FlexControl
- 859 FLEX Series (Legacy) Radios
- 886 Genius Products
- 450 Power Genius XL Amplifier
- 320 Tuner Genius XL
- 116 Antenna Genius
- 281 Shack Infrastructure
- 197 Networking
- 442 Remote Operation (SmartLink)
- 137 Contesting
- 741 Peripherals & Station Integration
- 137 Amateur Radio Interests
- 954 Third-Party Software