FLEX SAYS: "The FLEX-6300, FLEX-6500 and FLEX-6700 all have the option of receiving from the
XVTR port. The XVTR port is not recommended as a receive antenna port if an
external preamp is used on its antenna. Transmission on the XVTR port could put
up to +10 dBm of reverse power into the connected preamp."
Many people I know, including myself, use a variety of preamps as needed on their extensive receive antennas. My Hi-Z array has 8 preamps with one at each 24ft tall rx antenna and I have another two available inside the shack as well as the DXE preamp at the array center (over 800ft away). Isnt there a way to inhibit the TX side of that same bnc connector so up to +10dbm of power doesn't fry the preamps? I know I am ok with the 6700 as I have dedicated RX inputs but what about the users of a 6300? I sent my 6700 in for a tuneup so currently I cant open the GUI to check if indeed the Xvtr port can be inhibited from TX only. (and of course I cant remember) .
- 890 Posts
- 135 Reply Likes
Posted 6 years ago
- 890 Posts
- 135 Reply Likes
let me shorten this question up a bit... Can the XVTR port on the 6300 be inhibited from transmitting when the port is used as a RX only port ?
Lee, Elmer
- 680 Posts
- 287 Reply Likes
Sounds like you have a heck of a set up Larry!
73 W9OY
- 651 Posts
- 178 Reply Likes
- 689 Posts
- 230 Reply Likes
- 890 Posts
- 135 Reply Likes
Hi Jon, we are not talking about protecting the radio input from overload by using either this DXE Unit or the Array Solutions AS-FEP unit for example. We are asking about protecting the external preamps from the radio output per the F6300 manufacturers warning as stated above. Im not sure the unit you link to is intended to be used in a reverse configuration.
It may be a moot point... I have asked the RX preamp manufacturer for information as to what it will withstand for RF input on its output side.
Regards
Lee, Elmer
- 680 Posts
- 287 Reply Likes
73 W9OY
Steve - N5AC, VP Engineering / CTO
- 1057 Posts
- 1099 Reply Likes
Second, from our perspective, the more options like this that are added, the higher the support load becomes because operators can casually check a box like this and then totally forget the box ever existed. Later when they are trying to transmit, we end up fielding a call from an upset customer that has spent several hours taking apart their station trying to find a problem, and believe their radio is broken. Although the resolution might be quick, it's no fun for our customer to have this kind of experience. This can also be embarrassing for a customer when in reality it's our fault for making something complex, really.
Third, I am a microwave guy and so my entire lash-up consists of a cascade of amplifiers, preamps, power supplies, etc. all depending on one another. Most microwaves will tell you that if you build a hardware system than can blow up if it weren't for a software setting, that what you have is a ticking time bomb. In other words, if you can break something with a setting in software, you eventually will. Knowing that your system can never achieve an over-power, over-current, over-voltage, etc. condition if you do something wrong in the operation of the station brings a certain comfort. It's nice to be able to tell a fellow ham "sure, try it out -- you're not going to hurt anything." I've operated stations before where I've been given very strict instructions that ended with "and if you do ___________ you will destroy _________ which will cost me _________." It's a lot less fun to operate given that set of conditions.
Fourth, as I suggested before, I think it is likely that this level of RF wouldn't hurt most devices anyway. In the HF world, we're all used to thinking that transmit power kills anything but antennas, amplifiers, coax and relays, but this is a very low level of power. If it's not a problem let's not fix it.
For these reasons, I'm going to resist doing something like this. But if it is shown that this is a necessary thing to do, of course we'll go do it. I'm just asking that before we complicate things for everyone, let's make sure it has to be done.
Steve
- 5 Posts
- 2 Reply Likes
I sent a note to Lee, K7TJR, the Hi-Z designer who warned of inserting rf into the JFET's in the preamps. I asked him to comment on the 10mW that you say is the limit of TX power that could be applied accidently.
If/when I get a response, I will relay.
Bob W9BF
Lee, Elmer
- 680 Posts
- 287 Reply Likes
The way you make a transverter tx mistake is you make a wrong choice or you forget or some piece of software, even SSDR chooses for you. I have never had the radio come up in transverter mode but I have had it come up in TX and RX ant 2 on some bands quite often. I never use ant 2. There is nothing connected to ant 2. It's not hard to spot because when the panadapter is reading -140 dBm I say "OH this must be in ant 2". If it comes up in TX ant 2 then I have to trouble shoot why my SWR is 100:1. It's either some state instability in the software (like it was preceded by some kind of funky shutdown) or old Hiram Percy is playing a trick on me. Either way it makes me nervous.
Your radio's code is not exclusively developed by you (Flex). You have an API that allows others to control the radio through their own software development. The 6300 has a transverter port which doubles as a receive port. It is a major selling point of the radio. I've had some email that indicates that one point, a external rx port, makes or breaks the sale. I don't see any reason to not have the software tell that port exactly how to behave as part of the API and the setup form instead of relying on fail safes. If you stuffed a cocked and loaded .45 in your pocket would you not lock the safety or would you rely on the hope that a misfire probably won't hit someone? There is a syndrome called Glock leg. It happens when someone pulls their Glock after doing a 3lb trigger job on the gun and that silly button they call a safety somehow gets defeated and you wind up shot in the ass. (this is my appeal to the Texan in you)
I've been thinking about getting one of those $500 Pixel antennas Greg uses at the hamfests. Maybe you guys could shoot some RF into that thing for me and see if it blows up.
73 W9OY
Steve - N5AC, VP Engineering / CTO
- 1057 Posts
- 1099 Reply Likes
- 890 Posts
- 135 Reply Likes
Steve: FWIW here is the reply that Bob W9BF and I received from Lee at Hi-Z antennas about our concerns using the Transverter port for preamplified receive antennas.
Hello Bob and Larry, I can confirm that the 10mw transmit power will likely not damage a Hi-Z 75 ohm preamp. I cannot speak for other brands. However, the level seen inside our amplifier is not just 2 volts peak to peak. First, our systems are 75 ohm instead of the 50 ohms stated by N5AC which makes 2.45 volts at the output of the amp. This then is transformed at 2:1 inside the amp which makes the voltage at the transistor 4.9 volts peak to peak. While this will likely not cause any damage it may cause IMD distortion in ours or other brands of amplifiers. While you would not hear this, it would be very harmful in a multi receiver station sharing RX antennas even on another band, and even if the receiving antenna is simply being split and sent to another radio. My opinion is using the 10 mw output transverter port for receiving antennas would not be a good idea in a multi radio environment. A single radio environment should be OK.
Lee Strahan Hi-Z Antennas
- 571 Posts
- 86 Reply Likes
which is why i still use my own, separate, rx only tx / rx box...
- 5 Posts
- 2 Reply Likes
What would be vy fb on setup would be a per band TX permission setting for each ANT and enable/disable XVTR for TX.
Lee's, K7TJR, comments strongly suggest that transmitting 10mW could be compromising. The word "could" infers the option being discussed is worthwhile IMHO.
- 13 Posts
- 4 Reply Likes
Method: On setup screens: Add a LOV (drop down) for each of ANT1, ANT2 and XVTR with values: TX/RX, RX, Inhibit.
Our GUI designer now jokes that every time we request a checkbox option "an angel loses it's wings." It's a tongue-on-cheek expression, but the point is valid: lots of options add lots of complexity. - Steve N5ACAgreed - 100 % unless there is a strong case, see blow.
Later when they are trying to transmit, we end up fielding a call from an upset customer that has spent several hours taking apart their station trying to find a problem, and believe their radio is brokenTo the GUI, add alt text over the field with the following values:
where RX - 'Transmit (TX) disabled in the Antenna Setup Page'
where Inhibit - 'Transmit (TX) and Receive disabled in the Antenna Setup Page'
Most microwaves will tell you that if you build a hardware system than can blow up if it weren't for a software setting, that what you have is a ticking time bomb. In other words, if you can break something with a setting in software, you eventually will.Understood, however - when I listened to your TAPAR presentation in Seattle on the 6000 series and the introduction of the 6300 (the reason I bought one) .. you focused on wanting to deliver a better user experience, support bringing new folks into SDR realm (and the hobby).
I just ordered a Pixel Mag Loop receive antenna, to add a fast acting relay on the feedline to protect me from myself (sending RF down the feedline by accident), it would be considerable expense effort and more infrastructure to maintain. As this is a hobby, I work in Product Development at Oracle during the day .. I am often operating with a sleep deficiency. If the contesters do come, as I suspect they will after listening to your talk - they too will be operating sleep deprived and subject to making a mistake. Switching an antenna port to no load/ant, TX on receive antenna.
If I blew the LNA on my receive antenna or the finals on my 6300 (as I had no ANT connected to a port, in error -- While it would be self inflicted, some part of me would be upset my 6300/SmartSDR and Flex Radio .. as I would know that it would have been possible to add a feature that would protect my infrastructure.
The Alt text is in the context of the control. When I tried to click on the grayed out TX control, I would get one on the two messages, right there in context -- and I would know how and why. This should offset your concern about support calls.
Steve, please reconsider the request.
Warm Regards,
Steve Buchan
VE7ORA
- 5 Posts
- 2 Reply Likes
Excellent analysis and commentary. I, too, want to preserve my rx preamps, but I'm more irritated at ANT mix ups when switching slices during the chase of the rare one. Very difficult for me to practice self-discipline under such circumstances.
73, Bob W9BF
- 39 Posts
- 2 Reply Likes
Have I understood this correctly?
- 5 Posts
- 2 Reply Likes
I got familiar with SSDR by clicking on everything!
- 60 Posts
- 14 Reply Likes
Tim - W4TME, Customer Experience Manager
- 9202 Posts
- 3563 Reply Likes
Lee, Elmer
- 680 Posts
- 287 Reply Likes
You would choose ANT 1 or 2 for transmit and XVTR for RX on the Flag
73 W9OY
Steve - N5AC, VP Engineering / CTO
- 1057 Posts
- 1099 Reply Likes
- 1687 Posts
- 389 Reply Likes
- 39 Posts
- 2 Reply Likes
- 2 Posts
- 2 Reply Likes
73,
Dan N9WX
- 13 Posts
- 4 Reply Likes
Tim - W4TME, Customer Experience Manager
- 9202 Posts
- 3563 Reply Likes
- 29 Posts
- 6 Reply Likes
I could see myself falling into this trap.
- 178 Posts
- 22 Reply Likes
Lee, Elmer
- 680 Posts
- 287 Reply Likes
73 W9OY
Tim - W4TME, Customer Experience Manager
K1UO - Larry
Thanks Tim,
So unless the xvtr port is actually selected under the TX Slice Antenna Tab then there is no rf output there? That should probably be clarified in the SmartSDR Software Users Guide 1.2.1 pdf page 65.
Regards
Robert Farmer
Thanks, W9BF
Steve - N5AC, VP Engineering / CTO
Steve B.
Currently I have the RX ant on ANT2. It would be amazing if would could implement the TX Inhibit on any of the ANTn. I liked your argument .. but .. it would be much easier if this was just implemented in software. I think you told me a year or so back ... it was now on the list. I assume there is a not a public view of your sprint backlog of features or any way of knowing we approx this may hit SmartSDR for Meastro.
Steve
VE7ORA