Multiple Antennas - Best Practice?

  • 1
  • Question
  • Updated 4 years ago
  • Answered
Just put up the 40M beam, so now i have three antennas - 20/10M, 40M and 160/80M.  I have one amp.  What's the best practice to connect the antennas so I can work one band and monitor other bands on a 6700 with 2 SCUs?  How does this tie in with loggers that think slice A/B are "special"?  I'm looking at an Array Solutions SIXPAK as a matrix switch, but Array Solutions also recommends receive bandpass filters to protect the receiver front ends which is another bank of switching.  My 40M and 20/10M antennas share a tower and are close enough together that I expect there'll be some coupling.  Preferably a bandswitch is just a single mouse click and the logger follows to the active band.  Pointer to an app note, powerpoint or white paper would be great!
Photo of Asher - K0AU

Asher - K0AU

  • 208 Posts
  • 33 Reply Likes

Posted 4 years ago

  • 1
Photo of Jerry W4UK

Jerry W4UK

  • 44 Posts
  • 7 Reply Likes

1. For receiving wide-band, use a wide-band rx antenna like the pixel loop on the rx antenna port.

2. For tx, next time you upgrade your amp, consider getting one with multiple antenna ports. My Yaesu Quadra has 4 ports and they automatically switch in line as the band changes (which, BTW, is also automatic with DDUTIL controlling it). When you "dedicate" a port to a particular band/antenna, it also makes it easy to add a stub cut for a troublesome harmonic of that band if running SO2R

If I change bands on the flex, within about one second the amp changes bands, the antenna port changes to whatever ant I used there last, and any Quadra ATU presets changes also to whatever I used there last (the Quadra has a 3:1 capable ATU built in).

3. Don't know about the loggers.

4. Flex engineers have published allowable rf inputs and have mentioned that the flex is pretty well protected from reasonable voltage levels from nearby antenna coupling. I don't remember the details, but you could look them up, then measure your actual RF voltage levels before deciding if you need additional protection.

Jerry

Photo of ka7gzr

ka7gzr

  • 218 Posts
  • 36 Reply Likes

I have two Pixel Loops (now Inlogisinc) phased 90 degrees from each other. I use the RXA and RXB inputs on the Flex 6700. I have my PTT output wired to the power supplies of the Pixels and it shorts the loops and removes power to them to prevent damage when transmitting. I also have the same setup on my Icom IC-7850. The pixels are a wonderful broad band antenna and are really a 'quiet" antenna.

Jim

ka7gzr  

Photo of Asher - K0AU

Asher - K0AU

  • 208 Posts
  • 33 Reply Likes
Did you consider feeding the Pixel Loops through a 2:1 broadband combiner?  Looks like coverage would be close to omni.  I don't have enough coaxes for separate runs to each and don't have enough space to rotate one.
Photo of Ken - NM9P

Ken - NM9P, Elmer

  • 4199 Posts
  • 1336 Reply Likes
With the 6700 he can use them for diversity reception, which would be more effective than simply combining them.
Photo of ka7gzr

ka7gzr

  • 218 Posts
  • 36 Reply Likes

Ken is correct that the ultimate goal is a diversity mode. Currently the Flex 6700 and the Icom IC-7850 only run the individual receivers to a single side of a headset. QSB signals will sometimes be louder in one side of the headset and then will switch resulting in a swirling phenomenon in your head. Kinda of like Led Zeppelin's "Whole Lotta Love" but that's another story.

Hopefully Flex will develop a more sophisticated diversity mode. I don't see Icom doing this. However , the recent update from Icom for the IC-7850 enabled tracking of the 2 receivers. This resulted in allowing the two receive only channels to track, but I do not expect much more than that from Icom.

Jim

ka7gzr  

Photo of Andrew Russell

Andrew Russell

  • 276 Posts
  • 43 Reply Likes

Asher,

I have a 6500 with Pixel loop on RXA, 80m full wave loop on ANT1 and 160m inverted L on ANT2. So the three are available for RX and two for TX.

Andrew de VK5CV

Photo of Lee

Lee, Elmer

  • 680 Posts
  • 286 Reply Likes
I use a Wellbrook ALA 100M loop http://sdr-w9oy.blogspot.com/search?q=loop
Photo of EA4GLI - 8P9EH - Salvador

EA4GLI - 8P9EH - Salvador

  • 1780 Posts
  • 547 Reply Likes
I will let you guys know. It is through this forum that I got the clue to start looking into Magnetic Loops. It is just both the Pixel and the Wellbrook are prohibitively expensive to get into Barbados given the size of the package and it is a tough one to get through a friend on the plane. But getting the amp here was easy (small package through regular mail less than $10 to get here), so now it is a matter of trying different loop designs with materials that are readily available here, such as aluminum tubing, flat aluminum or copper tubing.
Photo of Lee

Lee, Elmer

  • 680 Posts
  • 286 Reply Likes
just 14g ant wire should be good enough.  No need for tubing for a RX antenna.  I have my loop long the perimeter of a crossed + pair of fiberglass arms  

73  W9OY
Photo of EA4GLI - 8P9EH - Salvador

EA4GLI - 8P9EH - Salvador

  • 1780 Posts
  • 547 Reply Likes
I am reading this document http://active-antenna.eu/tech-docs/3_ActiveAA_Antena_11.pdf
Check this excerpt from the document:

There are two goals when designing a small wideband loop - low inductance and large area. The construction of the loop should be made with the following rule in mind: the ratio of loop area to loop inductance should be maximized. That automatically means that a circular shape with 1 turn is the best choice. The material could be copper or aluminum – actually the loop Q-factor is not important. The important factor is the low loop inductance. The conductor must be as fat as possible to reduce the loop inductance.


What is your take on the inductance aspect Lee?
Photo of Lee

Lee, Elmer

  • 680 Posts
  • 286 Reply Likes
I think you guild the lilly.  "Best" is a very relative term.  In my experience if you increase the loop diameter you over come some of the form factor complaints, unless you are going for very sharp nulls in a discrete pattern like trying to null out a particular local noise source.   Of course the name of the game is experiment, but 20ft of fat copper pipe starts to get very heavy and expensive in terms of mounting and design compared to 2 oz of wire on 2lb of fiberglass.  Just offering my experience.  I think the main point is to have a single loop, and not a multi turn coil.  There are many more than 2 goals.  Size, weight, cost, and mechanical stability are also design constraints.

My present rectangular loop has a  circumference of 22ft on 8x8 crossarms and was very easy to build and was dirt cheap.  The wire stresses the cross arms and is structurally very solid in terms of weather and wind resistance but also very light, and for me this was as much a consideration as getting every last bit of performance from fat heavy costly circular pipes.  Performance is good from 630M to 10M using the Wellbrook amp, but the preferred performance of the system is 10mhz and below.  If you look at my blog (link above) you can see my build here is a youtube demo of the loop as built  improving S/N.  The demo predates the WBN blanker.  I'm very interested in what you come up with.

73  W9OY
(Edited)
Photo of EA4GLI - 8P9EH - Salvador

EA4GLI - 8P9EH - Salvador

  • 1780 Posts
  • 547 Reply Likes
Hi Lee,

I am investigating the loops. It is not my text that I quoted there, I was sincerely curious on your opinion about the single 14 gauge cable vs what that document says about the higher inductance. I can see your point about the weight. That makes a lot of sense.

Thanks for your links.

73s
Photo of Chuck - KJ6HT

Chuck - KJ6HT

  • 49 Posts
  • 8 Reply Likes

Does anyone have any experience with the Wellbrook Model ALA1530LNPro IMPERIUM ? The specs are very impressive and the testimonials indicate that it outperforms the Pixel (DX Eng.) Pro 1B.