is the 6600m will be in some way better from the 6700

  • 1
  • Question
  • Updated 10 months ago
is the 6600m will be in some way better from the 6700 
or what is the big different please [yes i know the m have control ] 
thank you 
73 elan g0uut
Photo of elan

elan

  • 140 Posts
  • 4 Reply Likes

Posted 10 months ago

  • 1
Photo of Ria - N2RJ

Ria - N2RJ, Elmer

  • 2254 Posts
  • 879 Reply Likes
Key advantages:
The 6600 will have the 7th order filters on the contest bands
M models have the HDMI out, and the front panel
6600 has modular design so stuff can be added later on. 6700 is what it is, except for the GPSDO and things external to the radio. 
Photo of John - WA7UAR

John - WA7UAR

  • 102 Posts
  • 25 Reply Likes
For my own use case I like that the 6700 has 2m/70cm accessibility. I purchased the DEMI amplifier and xverter to make all the magic happen.
Photo of Ria - N2RJ

Ria - N2RJ, Elmer

  • 2254 Posts
  • 879 Reply Likes
The 6700 does have 2m but not 70cm. For both rigs you'll need a transverter for 70cm. 
Photo of elan

elan

  • 140 Posts
  • 4 Reply Likes
thank you 
well i do not use 2m/70cm not much action in EU on this band at all 
so i dont need this 2 band  thank you Ria 
Photo of John - WA7UAR

John - WA7UAR

  • 102 Posts
  • 25 Reply Likes
Thanks for the clarification Ria.
Photo of John - WA7UAR

John - WA7UAR

  • 102 Posts
  • 25 Reply Likes
Elan, reading over the comparison list I note that the 6700 does offer 4m IF too.
Photo of Ria - N2RJ

Ria - N2RJ, Elmer

  • 2254 Posts
  • 879 Reply Likes
I like the option for EME, but transverters will work for that too. 
(Edited)
Photo of Tim - W4TME

Tim - W4TME, Customer Experience Manager

  • 9148 Posts
  • 3466 Reply Likes
Photo of elan

elan

  • 140 Posts
  • 4 Reply Likes
hi Tim 
yes i see it 
tnx 
Photo of elan

elan

  • 140 Posts
  • 4 Reply Likes
hard to tell if flex will replace the 6700 who know the 6600m look good but will have to wait and see 
73 elan g0uut
Photo of Ria - N2RJ

Ria - N2RJ, Elmer

  • 2254 Posts
  • 879 Reply Likes
The 6700 is a high end rig but is pretty expensive for most users. The 6600 brings most of what they want down to a better price range. However, I can see some power users still going to the 6700. I don't think I'm getting a 6600 unless it's for a remote site. 

Either way more choice is good. 

It seems as if the 6600 is the best of the 6700 and 6500 but missing some of the high end capability. So the 6700 remains an option for those that want 8 slices and 2 meters. 
Photo of Neal - K3NC

Neal - K3NC, Elmer

  • 438 Posts
  • 130 Reply Likes
I will take either one as a gift in a heartbeat, but if I had to buy one right now the 6600 would be my radio!
Photo of EA4GLI - 8P9EH - Salvador

EA4GLI - 8P9EH - Salvador

  • 1752 Posts
  • 534 Reply Likes
In my personal use case and opinion the biggest advantage of the 6600 is the 2 transverter ports. It would have been great to have them in the 6700. More versatility to work with UHF and SUHF transverters.

If I was in the market now I would go for the 6600 over the 6700.

I own the 6700.
Photo of EA4GLI - 8P9EH - Salvador

EA4GLI - 8P9EH - Salvador

  • 1752 Posts
  • 534 Reply Likes
I would like to add that the Loop options on the 6700 and 6500 are great. You can add low power home made pre selectors in the loop chain and activate them inside SmartSDR.

I built one to attenuate AM stations and I lower my noise floor noticeably for HF bands.
Photo of Sergey, R5AU

Sergey, R5AU

  • 835 Posts
  • 109 Reply Likes
Hi Salvador, could you send to me short mail to r5au(at)outlook.com. i wanna talk to you regarding your setup.