Please add the FPS setting to the list of persistence items or a user selectable default so we don't have to change it all the time.
THanks
Greg
THanks
Greg
Posted 6 years ago
I recall having a discussion with someone from FRS about a week or so ago and he mentioned that the designers thought the current display was what everyone would like. He then said there were many complaints and they are now changing their thinking and I think he said they were going to implement averaging for the display at some point.
Man oh man, I'm not sure how they would think that? I sure hope they get averaging going. I got my 6xxx series to gain features over my 5xxx, not lose them! :(
After 10 years as PowerSDR user, I find 15 FPS is the better in SSDR withou AVG available.....and this value save a lot of CPU work (for those who do not have a great GPU) without weak signal confused in the noise.
This picture was taken at 15 FPS
73 Beppe
ik3vig
woodboxradio
This picture was taken at 15 FPS
73 Beppe
ik3vig
woodboxradio
Robert -- N5IKD, Elmer
Hi Beppe. That is the point....many like it with avg and some without. It seems like an important function that is missing.
In your photo....you are right...it is not "too" bad with multiple panadapters displayed or the SSDR window shrunk in size. But with one panadapter displayed in a large size it is very very annoying. I don't always need to have multiple panadapters running and SSDR runs full screen on a 24" touch computer. Even when not a full screen I can't take the fast FPS. 20-25 FPS WITH averaging is perfect for me.
73
Greg
In your photo....you are right...it is not "too" bad with multiple panadapters displayed or the SSDR window shrunk in size. But with one panadapter displayed in a large size it is very very annoying. I don't always need to have multiple panadapters running and SSDR runs full screen on a 24" touch computer. Even when not a full screen I can't take the fast FPS. 20-25 FPS WITH averaging is perfect for me.
73
Greg
I agree Greg!
Yes please, FPS, AVR and the possibility to fill the Panadaper just as the very good PowerSDR.
By "fill the panadapter" do you mean "waterfall" or "Pan-fall?"
Both are on the roadmap, but several updates down the road.
I have found the pan-fall to be one of the most helpful features on my Flex-1500. It was one of the features that convinced me that Flex was the way to go and motivated me to purchase the 6500.
I am eagerly awaiting the release of both features, especially pan-fall!
But neither one will be as effective without trace averaging.
Both are on the roadmap, but several updates down the road.
I have found the pan-fall to be one of the most helpful features on my Flex-1500. It was one of the features that convinced me that Flex was the way to go and motivated me to purchase the 6500.
I am eagerly awaiting the release of both features, especially pan-fall!
But neither one will be as effective without trace averaging.
See this post for a picture I posted on TRACE AVERAGING. It really helps to see why this is so important.
http://community.flexradio.com/flexra...
Regards, Al / NN4ZZ
http://community.flexradio.com/flexra...
Regards, Al / NN4ZZ
I missed that posting. Thank you for making me aware and for the pictures.
the best way to see really weak signals at the noise level or below is a waterfall or Panafall set to a fairly narrow bandwidth and employing averaging. you can definately see weak signals that you wont notice in just a regular Panadapter setting even if it is averaged. I find the "Panafall" the best of both worlds and a very handy DXing tool. Even more so on 160 meter weak signal work.
That is exactly what I found, too, Larry. Panfall with Averaging is the best!
It not only allows you to see the weak ones, it allows you to see them over time, in case you are not looking at the precise moment it appears, or if you have multiple signals you are tracking. There is nothing as useful to combine the visual and auditory powers of the mind to dig out the weak ones, or to separate a busy band full of SSB for that matter.
It not only allows you to see the weak ones, it allows you to see them over time, in case you are not looking at the precise moment it appears, or if you have multiple signals you are tracking. There is nothing as useful to combine the visual and auditory powers of the mind to dig out the weak ones, or to separate a busy band full of SSB for that matter.
