Welcome to the new FlexRadio Community! Please review the new Community Rules and other important new Community information on the Message Board.
If you are having a problem, please check the Help Center for known solutions.
Need technical support from FlexRadio? It's as simple as Creating a HelpDesk ticket.
Need technical support from FlexRadio? It's as simple as Creating a HelpDesk ticket.
Need the latest SmartSDR and Power Genius Software?
SmartSDR v3.1.12 and the SmartSDR v3.1.12 Release Notes. | SmartSDR v2.6.2 and the SmartSDR v2.6.2 Release Notes.
SmartSDR v1.12.1 and the SmartSDR v1.12.1 Release Notes. | Power Genius XL Firmware v3.4.16. | Power Genius XL Utility v2.2.10.
SmartSDR v3.1.12 and the SmartSDR v3.1.12 Release Notes. | SmartSDR v2.6.2 and the SmartSDR v2.6.2 Release Notes.
SmartSDR v1.12.1 and the SmartSDR v1.12.1 Release Notes. | Power Genius XL Firmware v3.4.16. | Power Genius XL Utility v2.2.10.
SmartSDR Mouse Wheel Tuning
Brian - K6BPM
Member
I apologize if this has been asked before but I cannot find the answer anywhere.
Before I purchased my 6300, I had a 3000 using PowerSDR. One feature I really loved was the ability to hover the mouse cursor over any number on the frequency display and tune using the mouse wheel. This allowed the user to easily step by 1Hz, 10, 100, 1k, etc. It made tuning a breeze.
This high level of application polish has been neglected in SmartSDR. You can only tune by whatever step value you have set.
One of the things that set Flex apart was attention to little operating details that made the PowerSDR developers stand out. SmartSDR has lost many of the "smarts" that PowerSDR had and while it is a nicely done program, many thoughtful details are gone. Indeed, many mouse hover and wheel "opportunities" are simply ignored.
Are there any plans to bring this back in SmartSDR?
Please do not abandon your efforts towards those user friendly little features that turn a good application into a great one.
Before I purchased my 6300, I had a 3000 using PowerSDR. One feature I really loved was the ability to hover the mouse cursor over any number on the frequency display and tune using the mouse wheel. This allowed the user to easily step by 1Hz, 10, 100, 1k, etc. It made tuning a breeze.
This high level of application polish has been neglected in SmartSDR. You can only tune by whatever step value you have set.
One of the things that set Flex apart was attention to little operating details that made the PowerSDR developers stand out. SmartSDR has lost many of the "smarts" that PowerSDR had and while it is a nicely done program, many thoughtful details are gone. Indeed, many mouse hover and wheel "opportunities" are simply ignored.
Are there any plans to bring this back in SmartSDR?
Please do not abandon your efforts towards those user friendly little features that turn a good application into a great one.
4
Leave a Comment
Categories
- 69 Community Topics
- 1.9K New Ideas
- 120 The Flea Market
- 5.4K Software
- 4.9K SmartSDR for Windows
- 35 SmartSDR for Maestro and M models
- 86 SmartSDR for Mac
- 143 SmartSDR for iOS
- 149 SmartSDR CAT
- 67 DAX
- 278 SmartSDR API
- 7.1K Radios and Accessories
- 5.8K FLEX-6000 Signature Series
- 554 Maestro
- 14 FlexControl
- 722 FLEX Series (Legacy) Radios
- 149 Power Genius Products
- 117 Power Genius XL Amplifier
- 10 Power Genius Utility
- 22 Tuner Genius
- 41 Shack Infrastructure
- 22 Networking
- 89 Remote Operation (SmartLink)
- 50 Contesting
- 127 Peripherals & Station Integration
- 62 Amateur Radio Interests
- 404 Third-Party Software
Comments
Right on target, Brian. I complained about this long ago to no avail. SmartSDR appears "industrial" or "Military Contract" compared to PowerSDR which has "Heart".
My mouse wheel works from anywhere inside the SSDR screen. Flex 6300.
I use it all the time.
They appear to have turned all attention to the Maestro and
I wouldn't look for things to change any time soon. As you know things are full bore Maestro at the moment and it seems likely they will swing to full speed WAN remote next.
In several posts Gerald has made it clear that he views things like this as eye candy that don't help the Flex bottom line.
Jon...kf2e
So they produce a mess and call it just "eye candy" when the users want it fixing. Very nice indeed Flex. Good way to treat your customers.
I have been a commercial Windows software developer for over 25 years and I wouldn't know where to begin to start counting the number of companies I have seen fool themselves into believing that the UI user experience is second priority. Flex is indeed a top-drawer hardware company, but they also have the responsibility to an equally dedicated and responsive software company. We all buy the hardware, but we spend all our operating time with the software.
With the introduction of the 6000 series and SmartSDR, Flex "pretty-fied" the UI. Fancy looking UI's generate better screen-shots for ads and reviews. Older Flex users salivated at having a much nicer looking interface. PowerSDR obviously didn't have the same pizazz as SmartSDR.
But I wonder how many others were as disappointed as I was that much of the "heart and soul" of the original design was missing? Or, how many more mouse clicks and keyboard presses it takes to do some things now?
We have a cardinal rule in software design. "Less clicks is better". Flex missed a lot of opportunities to utilize the mouse capabilities like missing or incomplete tool-tips, hover detection and wheel operation over slider and spin-box controls, and of course, frequency tuning. Other things like band segment markers were apparently dropped for a reason that escapes me. That one little detail generated more "gee-****'s" from my friends I demoed my 3000 to than any other thing.
True, none of these user friendly and ease of use functions make for better screen-shots for marketing material and it is understandable that Flex would mistake these for superfluous "eye candy".
But in my opinion, they should re-evaluate their short list. What Flex thinks is "eye candy" is what turns "Flex users" into "Flex evangelists".
None of these things are hard to do, that's what I do every day. What worries me is that it sends a message to us Flex users that the commitment to excellence that drew us to Flex in the first place has now changed.
One final thought that anyone with experience in the software industry would agree with... When you let the marketing department define the software development schedule, no one wins in the end. Listen to the users. They are your best salesmen.
Steven,
That's is your opinion and you're welcome to it.
I want Maestro Bluetooth support and I want remote WAN support!
Incremental UI improvements aren't top priorities to me.
- Bob, W1RE
Very well said, and right on target.
"...the UI user experience..." is in the same department as "out of box experience" and neither seems to get much attention. (Like the Maestro mike connector snafu.) These little things can create either ongoing happiness or ongoing irritation and are cumulative and extremely important.
...generated more "gee-****'s" from my friends I demoed my 3000. It was open source GUIs that made my socks zip up and down and return to Ham Radio from a 20 yr hiatus (and spend money at FLEX.) When I demo SDR it is not SmartSDR because it has the clunkiness and erratic charm one might expect from Microsoft. The others are as from Apple, and first time viewers love and understand and relate to that.
What Flex thinks is "eye candy" is what turns "Flex users" into "Flex evangelists". Yep.
"Building a better mousetrap..." cannot be a singular priority while buyers are beating a path to the Shopping Channel which has better 'eye candy'. <ggg>. The world is loaded with unsold but not quite finished "better mousetraps".
I have hopes Maestro with it's new approaches will be better in touch with users. The new ICOM IC-7300 shows the big train from Asia is just around the corner and is loaded with user friendly features. Dayton should be interesting.
(BetaMax really was better than VHS. But they didn't listen to the end users.)
Hire more programmers if you must! These radios are not cheap. You can do it.
"Brian - K6BPM" explains it very well below, but I will furnish one example. It is windows convention that when the mouse cursor is over a slider, that slider gets the focus. Then one can move the slider with the wheel. By 'windows convention' I mean how windows apps normally behave. I have lost count of the number of times I have re-tuned my radio using the wheel when I was expecting to be able to control the underlying slider - so used I am to all my other applications behaving.
http://www.dxlabsuite.com/commander/Help/ChangingFrequency.htm#Changing frequency via mouse wheel
My bet is that most of our wish-list won’t materialise until V2, in which case the current “eye candy” will then suddenly morph in to “show-stopping can’t live without great new features”.
Somewhere at FRS there’s a secret list of user wishes and UI shortfalls, along with observations and user responses to the foregoing developments of PowerSDR. This will naturally be used to make us all salivate $$$ over V2.
So here’s, the thing: had FRS been honest with us upfront and clearly stated that SSDR would not be close to PSDR in several key areas for many years to come, then I would not have purchased a F6k, would you?
You can understand the marketing strategy, get the users locked-in (US software guys love vendor lock-in), but then hold back on the really cool stuff for v2 or even v3. I get it. It’s a commercial world, I’ve spent enough time in Microsoft software/systems to know how it works.
So, FRS I hope you get me too: I will only be buying V2 under very firm expectations: 1) that it has the majority of functionality currently within PSDR, 2) that keyboard input and mouse navigation is properly sorted out, especially with sliders and other clumsy UI stuff, 3) that programmable filters or macros are via F-keys, 4) that you learn to listen to users not just shareholders, and most importantly that V2 is released within the next 9-12 months max.
I do hope that FRS has this firmly programmed on their timeline, otherwise I’d expect to see lots of surplus F6k hitting eBay within a year.
73 de Steve G1XOW
"I do hope that FRS has this firmly programmed on their timeline, otherwise I’d expect to see lots of surplus F6k hitting eBay within a year."
Who would buy them knowing that they were being sold on the basis of how Flex was treating its customers?
I think Flex are going to be very careful in how they do this as nobody likes paying for bugfixes. We all know of software that has artificial major version number increases just to charge its customer base again. My backup/partitioning programs have not had a major version increase for over 7 years and there has been am amazing amount of enhancements and bug fixes. Are customers unhappy? No. Are they loyal? Yes. Is tech support up to muster? It is perfect.
"So here’s, the thing: had **** Politician been honest with us upfront and clearly stated that his promises and fantasies in several key areas would not happen for many years to come (if ever), then I would not have voted for him, would you?" <GGG>.
Regards. Dave.
I was immediately disappointed that most of the really neat little features I loved were missing. I expected some of this based in reading the posts in the forum but I never expected things like the mouse wheel tuning to be ignored, especially when things like that are easy to do. It seemed careless to me. You never want to release something with less features. But, giving Flex the benefit of the doubt I have watched and waited patiently, hoping that we would see small interim releases along the way as application "polish" was applied.
Rather than see them make an effort to catch up and fill in some of the niceties we were used to, they seemed to change their focus. There was no longer an emphasis on giving users a unparalleled experience. While we waited for some refinements to appear, we instead got the "road map" which basically told us that Flex was working hard finding ways to charge us more money. In fact we hear that some of the features we want like WAN access are indeed on the "road map" for a future paid upgrade.
This bothered me because I felt that the state of SmartSDR was and still is a "released beta". It is not even at "release candidate" stage. In my opinion, they still had a lot of work to do to bring SSDR up to the feature set of PSDR. What I really wanted was Flex to finish the current version before they charge me for a new version.
Of course Maestro development has taken over all resources at Flex. Nothing else is happening other than to prepare for the Maestro. So those of us that are really not interested in the Maestro much have to wait it out. We aren't going to see anything for us for awhile, it at all.
From my experience in the software industry, I am seeing an uncomfortable reality emerge. It is called "recurring revenue". It is what everyone strives for these days. Adobe and Microsoft now charge you *monthly* to use their software suites. You can't buy things and just own them anymore. You have to keep paying. It isn't just the profit this generates that is beneficial for a company. Corporate valuations are greatly enhanced when the company has a recurring revenue business model.
Now, don't get me wrong here. I love my Flex Radio. I would love it more if Flex payed attention to the little things we as users are asking for. One dedicated developer could knock off almost all these little gripes in 2 weeks.
But, what concerns me is the lack of concern as if there is another play in the works. I have seen it a lot of times before. Don't be surprised if we see some recurring revenue system work its way into the next major release. The buzzword I fear is "cloud" because cloud==recurring revenue (and a monthly charge for us). I can see the possibility of some kind of cloud model being introduced when WAN accessibility is available.
I sure hope I'm wrong and Flex is going to surprise us with a new release with all the cool bells and whistles. I don't want to be right, I want to be in love with my 6300 like I was with my 3000.
Well said!
I am not a programmer and I understand that changing one thing can break another.
The puzzling thing for me is, somebody must have decided at some stage not to include many of the useful and simple features from the start. being in the business, they MUST have known that it would be more difficult to fix in a running program than getting it 'right' from the start.
If somebody were to offer me a Flex 5000, I would be sorely tempted judging what others say the software has and SSDR lacks.
73 W9OY
I've personally spent a couple thousand hours over the years doing alpha testing and feature development with Flex, for free, to bring you a better radio. I'm intimately aware of what is involved. I have upgraded my radio with several 100's of alpha releases to squash the bugs before they get released for your consumption. Flex's process has nothing to do with schemes to rip-off unsuspecting users like you and some of the others in this thread imply. You are the one blowing smoke.
73 W9OY
I would not be so proud of admitting that you had some part to play in the state of the current GUI. You have done a poor job IMHO, and no doubt others too.
You are one step away from fulfilling Godwin's Law!